• Lemonparty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile pirating content and streaming it has never been easier. Jellyfin and private trackers ftw

    • snownyte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re correct.

      Social Media is the perfect example of this. Everytime a new social media network arrives, they always boast about being able to do things you could already have done with the other 9 social media networks. Sharing pictures and video, chatting .etc. They’re all things we could’ve already have done far way back in the days of messaging software like AIM. It’s nothing new, it’s just recycled ideas being treated as new.

      The only things that have ever improved were the amount of size of videos and pictures we can share and the speed in which we’re able to do it with. That’s it.

      The well of finding new ideas has ran dry, because they’ve all been tried and done before many times. New name, same old shit.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    MUuuhhaaaaa. I worked for a cable company for a little over a decade. I remember commenting when people everywhere were talking about its death that streaming would soon be just like cable. They called me a fool. MUuuhhaaaaa!

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a reminder to cancel Amazon Prime in a month. I never really used the TV portion until a few months ago and was like, fine … the selection sucks but it’s alright. After they introduced the ads now, it’s unusable to me. I’m getting rid of it entirely and not rewarding this type of behaviour.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The music industry figured it out: I listen to way more music than ever before and I willingly pay more than ever before

      Video streaming keeps trying to make my experience more frustrating, less value to me. They’re scrounging for dollars is driving me away. I’ve considered my options for making video entertainment enjoyable again, and I’m just tired of the whole thing. I’m spending more time in projects, more time online, more time reading ebooks from my library. I’m watching less video than before, enjoying it less, getting less value for my money and it’s just all not worth it. Their efforts to profit more from my attention are getting them less of it and losing my willingness to pay

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The big difference is exclusive content. Music has a few exceptions but in general sign up for one service and you can listen to anything.

        That forces music services to compete on the overall experience (and price), while video services pretty much exclusively compete based on what content is available and literally none of them offer all of the things a person wants to watch. So nobody will ever be happy with any streaming service.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think exclusive content is only a symptom of the larger problem, which is that we’re letting movie production companies run their own (new-fangled versions of) theaters again.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh sure, great idea! Henceforth, actors don’t get paid any more. that’s what you’re advocating, that’s what the music industry has “figured out” - how to steal all the money and give it to people who had no involvement with actually making the music.

      You should be pirating the fucking music not supporting the pricks who walked in off the street and stole everything

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Spotify pays more to artists than physical stores selling CDs ever did. And they certainly pay better than FM radio.

        Sure - if you were one of he top 1000 artists in the world the old system paid more… but it’s not like those artists are starving now — Spotify alone pays millions per year to the top thousand artists, and they also get paid by YouTube, Apple, TikTok, etc etc.

        The real way to make money in the music industry is and always has been live performances. A solo artist can make a couple hundred bucks a night doing simple cover songs, and a popular band can make a lot more.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went from cable to satellite in 2008 and then went strictly streaming in 2010. I’ve had Disney + and Netflix off and on over the years but I’ve found that I don’t need any of them. There are plenty of things to watch for free elsewhere and plenty of other things to do than watch shows that will be canceled after the first season.

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That article was worthless… basically streaming is expensive and not as awesome as it once was. There you go whole article

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still way more awesome than cable ever was. Sure you can have all the services all at once and pay as much as a cable bill, or you can rotate your subscriptions and pay way less.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure about that. Popular shows get canceled, unfinished. Huge price hikes, and you can’t jump to another provider to watch the shows at a new rate or call and threaten to cancel to get a new rate. Sure, there are a few good series, but it’s still mostly crap. Sure, you can watch some older movies on demand, but plenty aren’t available, are available on some other service, and/or require you to pay a rental fee if you can find it. Prices keep climbing, ads are constantly a threat, and they place more restrictions on how many devices you’re allowed to watch on.

        They are doing everything they can to re-insert the worst aspects of cable.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The real difference is you can watch what you want to watch on demand instead of being limited to their selection of shows on their schedule.

          Also, you can sign up for a month, watch a series, then cancel and sign up to some other service. Pay for several services and sure, it’s expensive. But one or two? Still a hell of a lot cheaper than Cable ever was.

          The fact most content is crap is irrelevant - there’s more good content available than any reasonable person has time to watch.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I sure soon they will introduce contracts making sign up for 6 to 1 year up front to prevent just that.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The biggest change to me is how much the streaming services are pushing commercials now. Paying to watch commercials really completes the transition back to cable.

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My hot take, in the digital age, all direct marketing should be opt-in with the platform. Opt-in for industries with the ability to ban specific advertisers.