That someone simply read the lawsuit that’s been posted a billion times. Did you read the article you posted? The first sentence links to their summary of the lawsuit.
Edit: Whether it’s a genuine pursuit or not on Elon’s part, it’s not the worst thing in the world to fight for AI to be completely open. Or in his case, the company he helped fund.
Whether it’s a genuine pursuit or not on Elon’s part
I suppose I didn’t separate those thoughts properly. But that’s exactly what I was getting at. If you read his lawsuit, that’s certainly at least part of the picture he’s trying to paint.
Edit: I’m not sure if you’re just bored and looking to argue? But you simply restated my point.
My point was more that I’m not sure what he’s doing counts as “fighting to keep AI open”. I mean, yes, that may be the stated purpose, but I really don’t believe that’s what he’s getting at
That someone simply read the lawsuit that’s been posted a billion times. Did you read the article you posted? The first sentence links to their summary of the lawsuit.
Edit: Whether it’s a genuine pursuit or not on Elon’s part, it’s not the worst thing in the world to fight for AI to be completely open. Or in his case, the company he helped fund.
No, but is that really what Musk is trying to do here?
Which is why I said:
I suppose I didn’t separate those thoughts properly. But that’s exactly what I was getting at. If you read his lawsuit, that’s certainly at least part of the picture he’s trying to paint.
Edit: I’m not sure if you’re just bored and looking to argue? But you simply restated my point.
My point was more that I’m not sure what he’s doing counts as “fighting to keep AI open”. I mean, yes, that may be the stated purpose, but I really don’t believe that’s what he’s getting at
Hvvgnnbggytrdvbbh
Must be true if Musk said it