So you can claim he was abused, and will belive he was, without any source?
How can you have an extraordinary claim and refuse to provide evidence, then you claim it’s up to the other party to show evidence they did not do what you claimed they were doing?
What logic is that? I thought it was innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent?
Based on your argument I’ll assume your a MAGA kinda person.
And of course, then your arguments turns into "well he doesn’t regret it…yet.
You want to have an actual discussion or remain in your land of what’s it’s and excuses?
Well you brought up abuse allegations against Nolan, so yes, it does infact does matter if Nolan is an employee or not.
Again, innocent until proven guilty.
You do not accuse without evidence and demand the other party defends their innocents.
And yes, in this case though not directly I am defending Musk. I’m defending Nolan, and the scientists at Nerualink who made this happen.
So iv accused you of being a Maga person.
You are a Maga person. I do not have any evidence, but until you show me evidence that shows you are not a MAGA person, you are.
Well you brought up abuse allegations against Nolan, so yes, it does infact does matter if Nolan is an employee or not.
So abuse against Nolan would be less worse if he wasn’t an employee? Is your name perhaps Patrick Bateman?
You do not accuse without evidence
We have hundreds of years’ worth of evidence demonstrating capitalist parasites acting like capitalist parasites - if you need more, you should apply for a position at FOX news. They always have a need for extra bootlickers.
I’m defending Nolan
No, you’re hiding behind him.
You are a Maga person.
Again… if I was sympathetic to fascists or the capitalist parasites fascists serve I’d be defending Musk - you know… like you’re doing?
but until you show me evidence that shows you are not a MAGA person,
And again… if I was sympathetic to fascists or the capitalist parasites fascists serve I’d be defending Musk - you know… like you’re doing?
Have you seen how Musk treats his employees? And the test subjects Tesla calls “customers”?
No… I’m going to need proof that he wasn’t abused - extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, after all.
…which you won’t be doing without defending Musk.
FTFY.
Based on your argument I’ll assume your a MAGA kinda person.
And of course, then your arguments turns into "well he doesn’t regret it…yet.
You want to have an actual discussion or remain in your land of what’s it’s and excuses?
That actually matters to you?
If you have proof that he wasn’t I’m all ears.
If I was sympathetic to fascists or the capitalist parasites fascists serve I’d be defending Musk - you know… like you’re doing?
Well you brought up abuse allegations against Nolan, so yes, it does infact does matter if Nolan is an employee or not.
Again, innocent until proven guilty. You do not accuse without evidence and demand the other party defends their innocents.
And yes, in this case though not directly I am defending Musk. I’m defending Nolan, and the scientists at Nerualink who made this happen.
So iv accused you of being a Maga person. You are a Maga person. I do not have any evidence, but until you show me evidence that shows you are not a MAGA person, you are.
Edit: spelling.
So abuse against Nolan would be less worse if he wasn’t an employee? Is your name perhaps Patrick Bateman?
We have hundreds of years’ worth of evidence demonstrating capitalist parasites acting like capitalist parasites - if you need more, you should apply for a position at FOX news. They always have a need for extra bootlickers.
No, you’re hiding behind him.
Again… if I was sympathetic to fascists or the capitalist parasites fascists serve I’d be defending Musk - you know… like you’re doing?
And again… if I was sympathetic to fascists or the capitalist parasites fascists serve I’d be defending Musk - you know… like you’re doing?