I read up and down the article and couldn’t help but wonder if EUV tin droplets could somehow be captured and reduced to smaller sizes required by this new stolen process that China is claiming to have discovered. Somehow I thought maybe they are trying to relate the two technologies…oh no, we’re not developing EUV machines from stolen company secrets! We’re recycling CO2!
But I’m hoping to be wrong.
Where did you see evidence that China is stealing somehow these discoveries ?
Supporting Information
Modulating CO2electrocatalytic conversion to organics pathway by the catalytic site dimension
Authors:
Haiping Xu,a,b,†, Jianxin Wang,a,b,†, Haiying He,c*, InhuiHwang,d, Yuzi Liu,e, Chengjun Sun,d, Haozhe Zhang,a,f, Tao Li,b,d, John V.Muntean,a, Tao Xu,b*, Di-Jia Liu,a,f*
Affiliations:
a - Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
b - Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA.
c - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN 46383, USA.
d - X-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
e - Center for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
f - Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
.* - Corresponding author. Email: djliu@anl.gov, txu@niu.edu, haiying.he@valpo.edu
† - H. X. and J. W. contributed equally to this work
Oh it’s from their independent labs that they got all the money… I mean research to pay, I mean learn about or discover the discoveries. I don’t think the DOE would be working to give China technology.
hu ? (I am very sorry, I don’t get it, what is this “their independent labs” you mentioned ?)