TheDuffmaster@lemmy.worldcake to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down124
arrow-up1391arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.worldcake to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?