jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square25linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareToes♀@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoAnything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoAnything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
minus-squareNullPointer@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoI’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoAs long as it’s your choice, sure. But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.
minus-squareZeppo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoIt doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
Anything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
Anything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
I’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
As long as it’s your choice, sure.
But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.
It doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.