minigubben's lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
schizoidman@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

Solar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output power

www.pv-magazine.com

external-link
message-square
175
fedilink
1
external-link

Solar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output power

www.pv-magazine.com

schizoidman@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
175
fedilink
New testing conducted at France's oldest PV system have shown that its solar modules can still provide performance values in line with what the manufacturers promised.
  • bc93@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s some nice fanfic you wrote but I don’t think we should base our real world decisions on your little ideas.

    It’s very easy to find this information so I can only assume you’re arguing in bad faith, but regardless, here are a few starting points for your research. You could also maybe just search it yourself instead of wasting my time and yours with your ridiculous example of a single hydroelectric dam.

    https://www.brookes.ac.uk/about-brookes/news/2022/08/researchers-agree-the-world-can-reach-a-100-renewa

    https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.apenergy.2020.116273

    https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2

    https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/cheap_safe_100_renewable_energy_possible_before_2050_says_finnish_uni_study/10736252

    https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.rser.2021.110934

    • Apollo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you even read the links you posted?

      • bc93@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hi babe thanks for asking, I read some news articles about the studies and I skimmed the studies themselves but I haven’t actually read them. Have you read them? Is there something fun that you’d like to share? Excited to hear more xx

        • Apollo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why waste time replying just to behave like a child?

          • bc93@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for the reply! My secret is that I’m always behaving like a child. I think it’s fun!

            Hope you have a lovely day <3

    • Waryle@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s some nice fanfic you wrote but I don’t think we should base our real world decisions on your little ideas.

      Point the flaws in my logic, debate my ideas, or just leave. Don’t waste your time making another reply if you can’t keep respectful, I won’t bother reading it.

      It’s very easy to find this information so I can only assume you’re arguing in bad faith, but regardless, here are a few starting points for your research. You could also maybe just search it yourself instead of wasting my time and yours with your ridiculous example of a single hydroelectric dam.

      Asking for sources and data to support a disputed claim is the basis of scientific debate. Becoming aggressive and disrespectful after such a mundane request is much more revealing of who is debating in good faith here.

      https://www.brookes.ac.uk/about-brookes/news/2022/08/researchers-agree-the-world-can-reach-a-100-renewa

      Relevant critic here

      TLDR : The study does not support the claim made in the title. It just says that it will be economically feasible. When asked about if its physically possible, they just throw some vague techno-solutionism, and even admit that 100% renewable will may never be actually possible

      https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.apenergy.2020.116273

      A request must be made to access this article, I highly doubt that you made one and actually read that report, so I won’t waste my time either.

      https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2

      This report does not even relate to our debate at all, it theorizes multiple scenarios for 2050, does not tell if it’s feasible and how, and none of these scenarios are 100% renewables anyway. This is out of subject.

      I’m not going to bother to keep going, it becomes obvious that you just took random studies whose title seemed to support vaguely your points , hoping that I’m as bad-faith as you and I that I won’t open them.

      Your statements are based on void and you become aggressive when asked for explanations. I take back what I have above: don’t bother to answer at all, I’m just going to ignore you from now on.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.28K users / day
  • 2.57K users / week
  • 5.59K users / month
  • 8 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 58.7K subscribers
  • 12.7K Posts
  • 537K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemm.ee
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • fry@fry.gs
  • L3s@fry.gs
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@fry.gs
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org