jwr1@kbin.earth to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWhy we don't have 128-bit CPUswww.xda-developers.comexternal-linkmessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWhy we don't have 128-bit CPUswww.xda-developers.comjwr1@kbin.earth to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squaredlundh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoDreamcast disagrees. https://www.consoledatabase.com/consoleinfo/segadreamcast/ /s
minus-squareDAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWas that a marketing thing? Because the SH-4 was only 32-bit AFAIK.
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoOnly thing I can find is that it has 128-bit graphics-oriented floating-point unit delivering 1.4 GFLOPS. Probably only for marketing reasons. Everyone was desperate not to be worse than N64.
Dreamcast disagrees. https://www.consoledatabase.com/consoleinfo/segadreamcast/ /s
So cool.
Was that a marketing thing? Because the SH-4 was only 32-bit AFAIK.
Only thing I can find is that it has 128-bit graphics-oriented floating-point unit delivering 1.4 GFLOPS.
Probably only for marketing reasons. Everyone was desperate not to be worse than N64.