• Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They’re cost effective as long as nothing goes wrong. Remember the knock-on effects of one ship blocking the Suez Canal?

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Whoa whoa whoa, on demand manufacturing allows us to be agile and utilize LEAN manufacturing to provide maximum value to our shareholders by cutting wages, cutting positions and not investing in a single fuckin lick of infrastructure.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If there’s a lack of demand, that should drive prices down. Probably not enough to cover tariffs.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Prices can’t go below the cost of production and transport.

      A lot of goods are on quite small margins. When the tariffs are bigger than the margin the product becomes uneconomic to ship to the US. This is what you’re seeing. There’s less demand for shipping because companies have halted shipments to the US.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          US isn’t the only market. Likely to see price drops in Europe when supply will outstrip demand, but still maintain a better margin that the US.

          At least until production rates adjust.