cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoSoftware Terminologylemmy.mlimagemessage-square206fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down150cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageSoftware Terminologylemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square206fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 month agoTo be fair i would consider a glitch to be closer to a ghost causing it than a lazy developer. I consider a “bug” to be something caused by the code (bad error handling, bad logic, etc) and a “glitch” to be something more random or environmental
minus-squareperishthethought@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoYes! Agreed. But for some reason, the only word everyone uses these days is “glitch”. And I don’t know why, but that really fries my grits.
To be fair i would consider a glitch to be closer to a ghost causing it than a lazy developer.
I consider a “bug” to be something caused by the code (bad error handling, bad logic, etc) and a “glitch” to be something more random or environmental
Yes! Agreed. But for some reason, the only word everyone uses these days is “glitch”. And I don’t know why, but that really fries my grits.