In theory of course. And please refrain from telling me why a global revolution would not work.
- Jury nullification. That’s a start. Dont vote guilty on certain crimes. You know what Im saying.
- Small acts of resistance. Just stop fully cooperating with the 1%. Spit in their soup.
- Large acts of resistance …
So many people need to get number 2. Decide your level of effort based on what you are doing. Helping an individual, go full out. Doing something for a corp, take your time.
What is to be done? Same as it ever was, build the party of the working class. For a global revolution to even be possible, the empire must sufficiently collapse. A year ago, I would’ve said it might’ve taken another few decades to really get going, but it seems we’ve left the decades where weeks happen and entered the weeks where decades happen. Let’s just say I’ll be really curious to see what happens when gas tops $10/gallon on average in the USA.
How did the french revolution start?
Peasants starve. “Let them eat cake” - nobles in their own bubble. Government in high debt.
It will work the same again. Its all about logistics and bulk goods.
Revolutions are context dependent. You can’t have a global revolution because it covers too many contexts. Global revolutions that do happen will be based on the contemporaneous development of local revolutions, that is to say a global revolution is a descriptive bottom up phenomenon, not a top down one.
You focus on your context. You figure out what that means. You do your part. Let other people do their part. You may find yourself as part of a global phenomenon, you may not.
Also, think about what a revolution is. It’s a replacement of a power structure. Globally, you could have a revolution against the UN, maybe. WTO? IMF? But you would have to get through your local power structure first.
So you focus on replacing the power structure in your context. Others focus on replacing the power structure in their context. And that’s how it goes.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1849/01/01.htm
England seems to be the rock which breaks the revolutionary waves, the country where the new society is stifled before it is born. England dominates the world market. Any upheaval in economic relations in any country of the European continent, in the whole European continent without England, is a storm in a teacup. Industrial and commercial relations within each nation are governed by its intercourse with other nations, and depend on its relations with the world market. But the world market is dominated by England and England is dominated by the bourgeoisie.
Thus, the liberation of Europe, whether brought about by the struggle of the oppressed nationalities for their independence or by overthrowing feudal absolutism, depends on the successful uprising of the French working class. Every social upheaval in France, however, is bound to be thwarted by the English bourgeoisie, by Great Britain’s industrial and commercial domination of the world. Every partial social reform in France or on the European continent as a whole, if designed to be lasting, is merely a pious wish. Only a world war can break old England, as only this can provide the Chartists, the party of the organized English workers, with the conditions for a successful rising against their powerful oppressors. Only when the Chartists head the English government will the social revolution pass from the sphere of utopia to that of reality.
For england read “the imperial hegemon”, for france read “the link in the imperialist chain that breaks”
Revolutionary dictatorship gotta press the reactionary hegemon hard and fight a world war against them. Otherwise there will be no global revolution and no communism, just endless counterrevolutions forever
To coordinate that many people, you would need either:
- a political party that would coordinate global actions via some sort of hierarchy
- a disaster of some kind that affected enough of the population that the entire world could be convinced to act all at once, or at least in quick succession, but still didn’t take out all of our communication structures so decentralized communication would still be possible.
We saw how Covid worked out so I think the likelihood of everyone not only acting at once, but also in unison, because of a disaster is quite small without a party to coordinate. There need to be constraints on behavior with levers of power to pull and enforce those constraints in order to get literally billions of people to do the same thing at the same time. I don’t see a way around it.
You need the foundations of a revolution before you talk about a global revolution. What are the foundations of your revolution? What does it desire the end goals of your revolution is just as important as starting a revolution. What does the revolution accomplish? Also and this is the most important. In order for this to be global or tread it needs to be founded under problems that can unify the population under a banner. This would be the “hope” of the revolution. Capitalism is probably the best foundations for a revolution and our current society is probably at one of the best stages. It’s perfect because no society can function properly if it funnels everything to 1% of its population.
Edit: just remember that the current governments can never provide the population with what it needs because capitalism is designed to provide that to 1% of our population and its being democratically enforced. You will forever be the rich classes sheep.
It would require several simultaneous grass roots movements globally rising up, or the complete collapse of the global economy.
So how would you get those going?
Well, you could launch a war with Iran, for one. That’s looking like a good way to destroy the global economy.
we’re doing it already, climate change


Perfect timing, I’ll be dead !
Find a common goal that catches peoples interest and is widely agreeable/acceptable but goes against current politics.
Castrating people in the Epstein files?
Many organizations with loose leadership but all with common goals.
That way taking out a leader or even cluster of the movement won’t stop it but just fuel increased determination of the others.
At least that’s what I heard is one way that one side can win against enemies with more tech , weapons, and troops than they.
Also. Let’s not downplay guerilla tactics.
They have always been effective against a bigger enemy.
Trump’s on his way to obliterating the petrodollar …
Violence. You want a revolution, you’re gonna have to kill some people.
That’s not true; there are plenty of logistics roles needed!

In seriousness; bloodless (or relatively bloodless) revolutions exist, but almost every time the ruling class is threatened, they choose the bloody route to cling onto power by any means necessary. I’ve seen my friends beaten by police just for protesting against the Zionist Regime, and that’s not even close to a revolution. So for all intents and purposes, we must accept that the necessary changes to society to fix all this, will end up violent.
Start by getting rid of your own debt, cutting down on purchases to the bare minimum, and saving up enough cash that losing work won’t affect you. Then start helping others do the same.
If no one is buying anything, there’s no government control.
Fortunately you won’t have to wait long. Either we get a revolution in the next 20 years or every non-1%er dies.
Dies, or is enslaved?
Same thing really imo
Start small: make your bed, brush your teeth, do your homework every day.
Bed made, teeth brushed, homework done. And now?
Nature says: IF you want the current regime ( in any ecology! ) displaced,
THEN displace it!
Don’t like Facebook’s monopoly? Displace it.
Don’t like political-parties’ railroading our world into ideological cuckery?
Displace it!
Etc.
For effectiveness, it’d require leaders, which the anarchists prohibit from their world, so they’re not going to help displace the organized-idiocy.
Communist & fascist imperialism will do EVERYTHING IT CAN to break any threat to their eventual-totalitarian-world-dominion.
Concentration-of-wealth-archy/oligarchy won’t tolerate any such thing, either.
& worst is the rude fact that as people’s contexts change, THEY change, so it has to be lead by people who’ve earned self-conquering, who aren’t malleable in principles or integrity, no matter how much force they are plied with, or how relentlessly they are plied with that force.
The people who felt class-elevated to be hobnobbing with Epstein kept their mouths shut when they shouldn’t have, simply because they’d be knocked lower down the social-status-hierarchy if they broke-ranks, & that social-pressure was sufficient to protect the entire Epstein-Class for decades.
That mechanism is in all of us.
It can be broken, through years of relentless pushing oneself into facing-karma, & breaking one’s unconscious-mind’s ignorance-dominion on one’s life.
Just identifying some of the key forces/factors that have to be dealt-with, in order for global-grass-roots-revolution to work, among the populations who are educated well/correctly enough to value critical-thinking.
In all the regions where education did what Leninism & Fox do, prevent that ( remember how the Republicans eradicated critical-thinking from all their territory after Trump won his 2nd term? ) … thos regions are no-longer recoverable, in WW3’s next 6-decades.
One has to accept that only a fraction of humankind will fight-off ideology-displacing-reason, & that saving the rest, thanks to education, isn’t possible.
Basic principle that Sunzi/Sun Tzu/Master Sun identified, 2.5 millenia ago: IF one is outnumbered, either defend, if one is strong, or evade, if one is weak.
Critical-reasoning is, globally, weak.
We either deal-with-that XOR we hand victory to the ideologues.
_ /\ _
Start by finding a general consensus over where we should go, the rest will follow.
The shortest path to revolution is simply the truth. As all unjust forms of power is undermined by it.
While truth, not unlike reality, is something very personal.
But still, how about having basic needs covered worldwide.
Only post-modernists have the luxury of separating truth from reality. Worldwide that is quite rare.











