Try PB&B on warm toast.

Definitely not an every day treat.

Jareth seems at least a little ungay considering his infatuation with Sarah.

As for Bowie: https://youtu.be/xxIBftflGvg

I have left-hand threaded fittings on a few things and always say to myself aloud “This is reverse-threaded” before I attempt to turn them then still fuck up first turn. It doesn’t stop me from fucking it up the first time - it just helps me remember why.

When I train new people on this equipment I tell them to say it aloud, show them, still fuck up the first turn, then they laugh.

Then I have them do it in front of me including saying it aloud - and they fuck up the first turn…

When you’ve been doing something unconsciously for decades it’s really hard to break.

“Those against making Election Day a federal holiday argue that such a large focus on one day is misguided, since almost 70% of ballots in the 2020 presidential election were cast before Election Day.”

___

While sedation is also accurate, I suspect you meant sedition.

Outdoors are generally not protected by right to privacy, even if on private property.

Someone standing in their own front lawn can be recorded with both video and audio without their consent.

This is what makes it legal to record police.

The problem isn’t just that it will be thrown out in court, it’s that it itself is illegal.

Which doesn’t necessarily mean don’t do it but you’re limited in how you can reveal how you know things are being stolen etc.

They’ll probably be this take on Gaston.

https://youtu.be/9DDN5nhCUUU?si=URyqTw3dfpIkxqTr

I’d say it also needs to be entirely optional and be opt-in only. Any service, program, whatever needs to work fully for anyone who doesn’t allow their data to be sold or released with extremely few exceptions.

Better solution.

Data are owned by the generator. Only they can sell it etc…

This also solves the privacy problem of law enforcement agencies applying warrants to phone companies etc. for access to your data, which has been an end-run around 4th Amendment rights for decades.

Someone fucked these up badly and there’s no way to tell from this how.

Are the numbers swapped between candidates but the sizes correct? Are the sizes swapped between candidates and the numbers correct?

As an aside, this is why serious data people don’t use pie charts. They’re terrible for lots of reasons, one being it’s very hard to compare areas instead of lengths, like a bar chart, as demonstrated by how many people didn’t notice these were so bad at first.

If you see data presented in a pie chart you should immediately be suspicious that it’s dishonest or incompetent.

None of that is to take away that voting for third parties this election is a terrible move - just saying this chart is useless.

Because their plan at the time was to allow (or assist) him to be propped up under the belief Clinton would then be a shoo-in. Which is a completely moronic strategy because if you lose you’re absolutely fucked.

They probably never want to actually keep him from being a candidate because it means their candidates just need to meet the barest of minimums to be viable.

You’re ignoring that Dems are using the same tactics you certainly bitched about Republicans doing then say others are ignoring reality and acting in bad faith?

Guess who never said not to vote democrat?

What are you smoking?

If you think it’s wrong for Dems to use the same tactics as Republicans then what the fuck are you bitching about?

You are defending this specific issue. See? Clueless.

https://youtu.be/CPRvc2UMeMI?feature=shared

Relevant part at 5:15 but it’s all on point. There’s a better version somewhere but this was the top hit…

I’m guessing you saw someone else post that and thought it sounded clever so you’d reuse it the first chance you got?

Because it’s completely irrelevant here…

Worry 1:Republicans are fascists that use manipulative techniques on their base. Worry 2: Democratic leaders just used a similar technique Republicans used against Biden and Obama.

I asked if they agreed with it first. Nothing I said is remotely both-sidesism - that Democratic leaders are using a tactic that I guarantee you got mad at Republicans for using is exactly the thing someone against both-sidesism should call them out for.

To point out that Dems slide right then defend a specific action where they continue to slide right seems awfully disingenuous - given you otherwise have no idea what anyone is saying it’s more likely you have no idea what’s going on.

Did you agree with this the last several times it came up? Did you upvote it on Lemmy?