Is an assembler not a compiler for an assembly language?

Is saying “I wrote code in assembler” not functionally equivalent to saying “I wrote code in GCC?”

Note: this is a genuine question, not sarcasm.

Or scripts for basically any other variant of the Bourne shell. They are, for the most part, very cross compatible.

Nah, WoW. Off the company RAID.

I think you mean here.

That just sounds like they need better NSFW tagging and enforcement of NSFW tags.

Well, that’s awesome. I primarily game on Linux and steamdeck compatibility seems to largely carry over for my systems and no EA app is a definite plus.

Hopefully, the game itself is stable (Linux gaming not withstanding) and actually good, the marketing has been kind of hit or miss for me.

That’s excellent, truly, but what about first party DRM?

Is it going to require the EA app when purchased on another platform?

Aperture Science, we do what we must because we can.

Well, mine doubles as a convenient place to store my grilled cheese

And Microsoft for monopoly reasons.

Add AT&T, Time-Warner, and all of the other ISPs that own streaming platforms for anticompetitive reasons.

Or you’re just really into the burn victim look.

Well, that’s kind of shitty. I know those models can run up to five figures, and if those rules aren’t enforced uniformly across the board for everyone then it does just seem like they’re targeting a particular class of creator.

As a side note, I find it funny that the article refers to then as “AI models” when no AI is typically involved.

With a sandpaper tongue and diamond studded grilles.

Any reason you can’t use a locally hosted VPN? That would be my solution for something like this. Either use tailscale or use a wireguard VPN and a dynamic DNS service.

Later on I might consider adding some PiKVMs in order to be able to more safely reboot/troubleshoot/access BIOS.

Changing the default settings wouldn’t mean changing any individual user’s settings. It would mean changing the default settings you get the first time you login. Which the user could then change to their preference.

If you have a bunch of elderly/non-savvy people who are using your server, being able to change the default settings to something sensible for that set of users would be a good feature to have.

I imagine he means being able to set the default view for everyone accessing your server from the settings on your server. So that everyone who accesses your server gets those defaults that they can then change for their user if they desire.

Which would be a nice feature.

He didn’t use encrypted everything. He had a public telegram group chat in which he stored a lot of his material. Which, as many people in the comments on the article pointed out, is not encrypted, but is presented by telegram as if it is. That’s likely how they caught him.

YouTube has a “Don’t recommend this channel” option. Which, as far as I can tell, does actually get them to stop recommending the channel on the main recommended feed. If you’re subscribed they’ll still show up in your subscriptions and will still show up in search if you look for them (to the extent that anything relevant shows up in search).

The option isn’t prominent, it’s in the “3-dot” menu next to a video on the recommended feed and I’ve been unable to find a way to view or manage the list of blocked channels, but it’s there.

Edit: a word - “able” to “unable”

https://lemmy.ml/comment/10310949

A comment on a thread about a similar topic from a while back. Looks like it might have some useful information for you.

That’s not entirely accurate. No self-respecting Alaskan would be caught dead associating with a Texan.

Remember kids, the only things bigger in Texas are their stupid hats.