Flag

Amd cruising on past reputation.

1 in a million chance?

Required by law? I dunno, im guessing here.

Not in the news where I am.

Ty for answer.

Pls elaborate, this seems interesting.

Thats a neatly condenced rant, for sure.

In my defense, the internet is filled with absolute lunatics.

… yes?

Uh how did starfield advance techn in a big way? Pls do elaborate on that one, cause i didnt see it

Sadly it seems that a good half of the political elite over there decided its more important to go at the other rough half of the political elite because its presidential election year.

Does he have the grey matter faculties to do this tho?

Good example of the ‘Corporate Ghoul’.

The need for a runway stands out.

Wasnt “No Child Left Behind” a Bush era policy?

There’s a question here tho:

Was this because of the sanctions, or because, one might suggest, that russian space tech hasnt advanced as you’d expect the last few decades? Maybe because the people who built the roscosmos stuff back in the cold war are now dead from old age, taking some important knowledge with them to the grave? :o

Lets hope other countries follow suit. Then it’ll actually hurt Meta/Facebook.

He is deluded, with an ego the size of Saturn.

One word: projection.

You didnt criticize for shit, just a meager and baseless accusation. Bye bye.

Also, to actually jump to using a wish for someone to get shot, either as suicide or by aomeone else, well there aremt that many other eays that tops that one in showing a frankly hillarious lack of a real point or argument.

Tl;dr: you suck at presenting an actual argument. Are you a genuine child, or a poorly educated adult?

Dishonest? Nice claim, care to back it up? If you can?

The standard is simple; provide something beyond a surface level claim. Or at least make an effort to make the claim seem reasonable. In this example, the original commenter you’ve jumped to defend portrays the dems as if its all their fault… but is it? As mentioned, there is the figurative elephant (gop) in the room, and all the shit they do, but … No, the focus was on having selected biden. Not only that but also implying the blm marches were the root cause. But what about the reason for the marches? Or the actions by the elephant? Its not that the context doesnt exist just because, we all know it does. So, to then argue as if that context is gone… why should we take that as a serious and legit addition to the conversation, when its really not?

Its also amusing to see you call me/us “dishonest”, as it seems to be the exact thing you are currently doing. Theres a word for this, and it is, besides being a tried and true tactic of the elephant: projection. Accusing others of what you yourself are or have been doing yourself.

So how about it?

Did you expect the same acceptance for empty words and unfounded claims too? You dont have a base right to get a proper reply, you have to earn it by making a good point (thats worth debating) in the first place.

Here is a pointer to where you wemt wrong: painting a picture as if this is lets say the dem fault, rather than the rampaging elephant in the room, the gop. Its an old method of “arguing”, and if you want to be taken seriously, should have picked a different tactic. But you didnt so… here we are.

Didnt he basically already do that, but the trumpsterfire declined?