

…2 mildly qualified women. Certainly not extremely
…2 mildly qualified women. Certainly not extremely
Blue is pretty shit. But it’s not authoritarianism. It’s a mistake to call it as such
For voting? red lines are for revolution. A redline to not vote simply reduces my own ability to have a voice in politics to no benefit… It’s short sighted virtue signaling that brings no benefit to myself or others. My redline is anti authoritarianism.
willingly, and without question, vote for their reelection.
That’s such an unnuanced take it’s impressive
Me when gravity is political
voters are part of the problem. Half of them, about.
Find dems in primaries that agree with you. If you can’t find one reasonable close, run yourself. That’s my mindset. Already trying to make connections to run myself
I mean, kinda. Guys I heard talking sounded the most concerned I’ve ever heard them. Normally when talking about trump they’re self assured, certain. Today, they were basically talking like they were reassuring themselves. Which is quite interesting. But still in the cult.
It’s easier to unionize domestically. Yes, they will start as non-union. But then you can unionize them.
Not to say this is the way to bring them back;; it’s absolutely not. But it would be GOOD if measures were in place to actually bring them back, as they could be forced to provide higher paying jobs
I’d like to know what you’re saying is eu/usa propaganda on lemmy. As far as I’ve seen, people here are extremely anti usa at a minimum.
Giving politicians money is a good idea, when you can be reasonable sure it’ll be beneficial to you or society. Money is needed for elections, and if you don’t give the rich will win all of them even more so
Term limits(for congress) aren’t an issue. It’s outright good to have a portion of reps with institutional knowledge on how to run a government, and extremely helpful in diplomacy with other countries as well.
Age limits are the real issue to push, because geriatric fucks being in charge is the real danger.
Everything else, I wholly and completely agree with you on
God that photo goes hard on so many levels
The vast majority of people here are reddit refugees, raised on a website that encourages being a prentious dick(me inclusive, too often, though I’m trying to be better) it’s unsurprising they’d take issue with the message
Yeah. The usa has always been relatively evil… But also fairly predictable .
Also worth noting that pretty much every country ever has been evil, with a few notable exceptions —of which none of the eu are included in
It should be very clearly stated that that is DIRECTLY contradictory to the Constitution still. You cannot be VP if you are ineligible to run for the office.
No, that’s still just a normal coup of congress’s authority
Any nuclear adoption is good news. This WILL help destigmatize them and help reduce cost by production at scale. Overall, while it’s extremely questionable, depending on how many companies get on board it could be net positive
i believe it’d be reasonably covered by freedom of speech
Bernies would’ve been a good example, no longer as he’s too old. Pritzker would’ve been. Anyone who doesn’t bend to the establishment.
People who follow security procedure would be pretty great too.
Hillary is so establishment entrenched it’s ridiculous. Harris did not have a spine enough to run her own campaign right. Those are what I feel make them less qualified for the office.
I don’t exactly go around looking at politicians to see if I think they’d be good as presidents …