IzzyScissor

Never thought I would see the day where Google crumbles, but they’re actively sprinting towards it now.

Seriously. The recent story of just how many people have died from the cops ‘giving them something to calm them down’ is insane. If you’re not my doctor, you don’t get to dose me with anything.

I remember one time when my dad renewed his car’s tags they misspelled his name on one of the forms and he only noticed after he was leaving.

It took another 30 minutes to sign paperwork confirming that (for example) ‘Austin’ and ‘Austyn’ are the same person, and that this was not intended to cause fraud. I can imagine someone seeing/experiencing that for the first time and thinking they found the perfect loophole.

Fantastic news.

I still want journalists to get definitive answers on things like, ‘Who gets custody?’ ‘How much child support is necessary for an embryo?’ ‘If life begins at conception, does this mean an embryo frozen for 21 years that is implanted and born can drink alcohol from a baby bottle since they’re technically ‘of age’?’

There are so many STUPID repercussions from this ruling, and there’s no logical explanation for it all. It’s the beginning of the end of the separation of church and state.

36-3-301(a)(2): Persons receiving online ordinations may not solemnize the rite of matrimony.

They already thought of that.

Yeah… almost like they’re stuck in a cycle of poverty and can’t save enough money for a down payment for a house either.

So ‘funny’.

The most terrifying aspect is that it isn’t just gay marriage at stake here - Interracial marriages, atheist marriages, inter-abled marriages… ALL marriages are at risk if a person you’ve never met won’t sign a piece of paper.

As someone who did, I understand the sentiment but it isn’t that easy. I have so many friends and family members who are stuck there because they can’t save enough resources to leave.

We should refer to him as a convicted rapist all the time.

So, openly admitting it was “quid pro quo”. Cool.

From what I understand - the first action the bad actors are taking are releasing the family trees to “out” anyone with Jewish relatives.

So, just hate crimes to start.

Because rules are how society works. If both parties agree to throw out the rules… we don’t have a democracy anymore.

“So Mr. Chairman, you’re saying because you think Sen. Grassley violated the rule, you’re going to violate the rule?” [Sen. John Kennedy] asked.

“It’s called precedent, senator,” replied Durbin.

Firstly, your ‘instance’ is just like your email server. It doesn’t matter if it’s @yahoo.com or @google.com, I can still email you and you can respond. Some people even have their own servers.

Next, imagine if Facebook, Instagram and Twitter users could all follow each other’s posts. The posts are already pretty much the same but we just add @Facebook or @Twitter to the end. You could log in to one, but see posts from the others. The only difference is the layout and design of the interface, like the difference between ‘Gmail’ and ‘Outlook’.

You can also move between servers easily if you want. Sick of @Facebook? Move to @Instagram without losing followers.

Or better yet - don’t interview him at all. Do an exposé piece on him that details everything and run it primarily in his district if you want to actually affect change.

The fact that he’s being interviewed only adds to his credibility, and no matter what happens here, people are going to think he’s just misunderstood, since “He’d be in jail if this were all true, right?”

He should be.

I dunno, He seems pretty incapable of doing the work. I doubt he could even understand the job, considering he ‘won against Obama in 2016’ and ‘is worried about Biden causing world war II’

Do installs of the same game by the same user across multiple devices count as different installs?

We treat different devices as different installs. We don’t want to track identity across different devices.

Jesus Christ. A single user can freely install the game repeatedly and bankrupt a creator.

Something which, notably, happens on around 1% of all applications, but is prosecuted less than 0.000005% of the time.

From 2008 - 2012 there were 32 million background checks, and 373,900 rejections.

Between FY 2008 and FY 2015, an 8-year period, ATF formally referred 509 NICS denial
cases that included 558 subjects to USAOs for possible prosecution. The USAOs
accepted for consideration of prosecution 254 subjects (or less than 32 subjects per
year) and declined to prosecute 272 subjects.

32 prosecutions a year for an average of 6 million background checks (completed, there is a much larger number for bg checks initiated)