

Yeah, AI was totally never used to describe the logic behind NPC actions as far back as the Atari days.
Yeah, AI was totally never used to describe the logic behind NPC actions as far back as the Atari days.
Just imagine how utterly fucked this woman’s life is. Gone for 6 weeks. Does she still have her job? Does she still have a place to live? Does she still qualify for her school credits? Not to mention, her name and general location are public knowledge.
I can’t see how her life isn’t utterly fucked.
Haven’t we blown past two different “this is the end” limits previously set? And we just keep making new ones?
I dunno, it really sounds like we’re fucked.
Oh sweet Jesus yes we did. I’d have voted current Fetterman over Oz any day of the week.
I mean, who was his Republican counterpart? Because I feel like Fettermen would likely be better than them.
Not saying I don’t wish there had been a different dem candidate in his place, but you can’t really fault voters for not realizing he was a bait and switch. Be it intentionally or the stroke.
I mean, yeah. Then promptly pardoned.
That’s the fucked up thing about this. The president can order his people to do things illegally in an “official act” and get immunity. Then pardon the people who do his illegal stuff.
The “checks and balances” require republicans to oppose their king. That ain’t happening.
Don’t yuck other people’s yum.
Damn those pesky democrats for doing this to us! /s
This is why Trump got reelected.
They responded to the wrong post. They’re likely thinking of the auto start post.
Eh…. I suppose in one sense it’s making it clear that this isn’t the original. But you can still see where the comic came from.
This is just pure, unadulterated ignorance, on full display for the world to see.
This reply is both unintelligible, and unhinged. You also seem to be berating someone for not knowing what baseload is, while simultaneously showing (I think, it’s hard to tell honestly) that you have no idea what it means.
By the time you hit the highway you’re usually warm enough that things have defrosted.
“Of course I would” has always been the response though.
He might even break out “gaylord” if he hits the right timespan.
Stating what I take the arguments as, is absolutely not a strawman. At no point did I say “you are stating that you want Trump to win, why would you say that?”
If you need me to define strawman arguments, I can. But it might be better if you just googled it instead.
Of course you could always shove your head deeper in that hole if you like. Perhaps going “lalalalala” while doing so.
They aren’t explicitly trained to sound confident, that’s just how users tend to talk. You don’t often see “I don’t know but you can give this a shot” on Stack Overflow, for instance. Even the incorrect answers coming from users are presented confidently.
Funnily enough, lack of confidence in response is something I don’t think LLMs are currently capable of, since it would require contextual understanding of both the question, and the answer being given.