• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2024

help-circle


  • I have been thinking about how or if I would track my own children. I do not have any at the moment though.

    I think the only system that would work with tracking and still be ethical is a system with accountability.

    They need to know that I would never check unless there was an emergency. So we’d have to have some sort of immutable log that they can check regularly. So they know if I checked their location. It should not be like a panopticon. in which they don’t know if the parent is checking their location or not. That changes behaviour. Even with the trust that I would not check, just me having the option would alter behaviour probably.

    Youth and kids are independent individuals with their own rights to privacy, autonomy, right to select their own friends and acquaintences, right to freedom of expression and movement, right to make mistakes, etc. If they are thought right and have a high trust bond with their parents, preferably with little judgement, then it will probably be fine and most issues can be solved.







  • I don’t have in-depth knowledge of the differences and how big that is. So take the following with a grain of salt.

    My main point is that using containerization is a huge security improvement. Podman seems to be even more secure. Calling Docker massively insecure makes it seem like something we should avoid, which takes focus away from the enormous security benefit containerization gives. I believe Docker is fine, but I do use Podman myself, but that is only because Podman desktop is free, and Docker files seem to run fine with Podman.

    Edit: After reading a bit I am more convinced that the Podman way of handling it is superior, and that the improvement is big enough to recommend it over Docker in most cases.


  • There are another important reason than most of the issues pointer out here that docker solves.

    Security.

    By using containerization Docker effectively creates another important barrier which is incredibly hard to escape, which is the OS (container)

    If one server is running multiple Docker containers, a vulnerability in one system does not expose the others. This is a huge security improvement. Now the attacker needs to breach both the application and then break out of a container in order to directly access other parts of the host.

    Also if the Docker images are big then the dev needs to select another image. You can easily have around 100MB containers now. With the “distroless” containers it is maybe down to like 30 MB if I recall correctly. Far from 1GB.

    Reproducability is also huge efficiency booster. “Here run these this command and it will work perfecty on your machine” And it actually does.

    It also reliably allows the opportunity to have self-healing servers, which means businesses can actually not have people available 24/7.

    The use of containerization is maybe one of the greatest marvels in software dev in recent (10+) years.








  • This sound a bit like depression, but I am no medical professional.

    Imagine all the input you get every day both positive and negative. When we are depressed we do a worse job at filtering out the negative.

    If this is how you feel all (or most) of the time for a prolonged period, I would consider talking to your doctor. Antidepressants can help a lot. They can take weeks to months to be effective, but they work.

    If you are sceptical about medication, it does not hurt to read about it and how they work.

    Anyways, I hope things improve for you!