The second one gets blown really out of proportion

He was told a list of people and was asked if any of them would convince him to step down

If he said yes to any of them it would mean he trusts their judgement more than his own which would be a terrible look for a president so he basically said there is nobody who shapes my decision besides myself and God (because you need christian voters)

So Biden could just seal team 6 half the Supreme Court plus Trump, and it would be legal as long as he officially says he did it afterward?

But can you explain why they did not start with one+two

In the direct, they said 3 1 2 is a good order to play

O have only played 11, so I am not familiar with it ,but that seemed very weird to me

I mean the drawing depicts a feathery not a furry so the point stands

Nuclear is the most expensive energy technology used, so expansion is only useful if all renewable sources are already built out to the limit

This is not the case, so investing in renewable is the smarter choice environmentally and fiscally

Of course, the route we took in Germany reducing nuclear to upscale coal is even stupider, but it is far too late to reverse that

I am very interested how well riddles will work, when it looks like somethings can just brute force you through any problem

In totk they solved this by limiting your abilities in shrines. I wonder if they will do something similar here

What I like about the trailer is how it is a new feature that Edgeworth uses logic, making it canonical that all the defense attorneys you play are just rambling and then throwing out a lucky guess

Mate, it takes the combined discussions of the internet

I would not expect any sort of values

Let’s start with divorcees not being allowed to run in the 2024 election if it is so incredibly unethical and all

Wouldn’t being convicted for election fraud in some way stop you from actively participating in elections?

This was not about being scared and more of a social contract

They would not select judges on the end of a presidents turn, based on the trust that the other party wouldn’t either

As soon as one party stops holding to this unwritten agreement (as Republicans did under Trump), there is little to no incentive for the other party to continue abiding to it

What is the definition of my worst enemy? Can I just declare e.g. Putin to be my mortal foe?

If it has to be somebody I have met so far, I will rather save a human than a cat

Why, because a human has more potential to effect the world, has an understanding of death and therefore the worse time dying and in the interest of a species your should allways priotize members of your own species

I have uBlock on my PC, but not on my phone

I mean, as long as they only do so in the primaries, this is a valid behavior.

In the actual election, however, I strongly suggest voting the lesser of two evils when the other option has cited mein kampf and said they want to be a dictator

After that, you can still go on the street and demonstrate for the abolishment of the electoral college and a system that only allows two parties to have chances

No we just care less about theft. The German ones are build to maximace speed and therefore usability. This theoretically makes it rather easy to steal.

If this would become to much of a problem they would also reduce comfort to increase security

if AI.sencience = EVIL: os.system(‘shutdown -h fucking_now’)