• 1 Post
  • 899 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 24th, 2023

help-circle






  • The problem is that shitty rule is often (not sure about NY specifically) added after the fact to stop Tesla.

    The general rule was always if you ever used a dealership you have to continue using a dealership. (and Tesla never has so shouldn’t have to)

    Then when Tesla came around the auto makers dealers lobbied to change that to you must use a dealership regardless. In some cases Tesla lobbied/went to court against that and got exemptions, in some cases got it thrown out, and in some cases outright lost.

    The rule of having to use one if you already use one makes sense. The dealerships put a lot of money into it and could be rugpulled otherwise.

    But changing a law specifically to fuck with Tesla was more than just a shitty rule.

    But I don’t know if NY is one of these places that changed the rules to fuck them in the first place.




  • AI Answer to how many you’d need

    To sustainably feed yourself with rabbits, you’d likely need a small breeding colony of rabbits. A few does (female rabbits) and a buck (male rabbit) could produce enough meat for one person. A guideline is one doe and a buck can produce about 2-3 dozen meat rabbits per year, says Polyculture Farming. More Details:

    Breeding:

    A small breeding colony of rabbits, like 2 does and a buck, could potentially produce 40-50 rabbits per year, enough for a small family, according to Mother Earth News.

    Meat Yield:

    A rabbit can yield a significant amount of meat. One rabbit can easily feed a family of four, and they are generally sold whole, weighing just under three pounds, says Countryside Magazine and FoodPrint.

    Sustainability:

    Rabbits can be a sustainable meat source due to their relatively efficient conversion of feed to meat compared to other livestock. Individual Needs:

    The number of rabbits needed would depend on your individual meat consumption and preferences.








  • That said, I think the core concern can be rephrased in a way that gets at the essence, and to me there’s still a live issue that’s not relieved simply by noting that this requires probable cause.

    Well ya. The whole thing is really fucked in the first place. It’s very disturbing that it was ruled they can compel biometics in any circumstance.

    In a far off future, this ruling would probably even allow a mind reading device to figure out a PIN, which would be protected, because they didn’t force you to say it, and reading electrical signals isn’t really any different than reading ridges on a finger.




  • Right, but they can’t just do it without reason which he was implying, and he replied to me with

    “Yea but that wasn’t the point of me pointing it out. The point was that they don’t need to resort to such measures in order to clandestinely acquire your unlocked phone.”

    In this case he was on parole where they have the right to search him. That mention of blood draw etc, you’re already under arrest and they can search your person anyway.

    I’m not aware of any law where a cop can walk up to you on the street and demand they unlock your phone with biometrics and search it without cause.