• 2 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 17th, 2025

help-circle







  • yeah i see that marx said

    [doing away] with all repose, all fixity and all security as far as the worker’s life-situation is concerned; how it constantly threatens, by taking away the instruments of labour, to snatch from his hands the means of subsistence, and, by suppressing his specialised function, to make him superfluous

    but that’s marx just saying industrialization is threating working class. im not seeing much myth just boring explanations of workers relation to machinery

    I do use perplexity and chatgpt to code a lot. i really rather not go to stack overflow and try to understand three posts and figure out an implementation. I’m fine with that being automated


  • Yeah if you have better way of doing anything with no drawbacks you should do that I’ll just say out of pure reason.

    Thinking about deterministic results. I can think of a flawed code that gives a wrong result deterministically 1 out of its thousands of potential outputs and you can determine that 1 wrong answer is A) not big enough flaw to fix(code is good enough) B) not worth fixing since it’s rare (too much effort to fix). Now how that applies to LLM is that you can see the what LLM outputs and determine it’s execution is good enough or not working.

    Using a lot of resources at the cost of the environment is more a value thing. Cyanobacterial didn’t care about poisoning the environment with oxygen. Ironically I don’t think the electric grid should be restructured for ai since I don’t think so is doing anything important enough to warrant changing the electrical grid.

    I would care if someone was rude or unqualified on an issue. Id want to know why something I did was wrong, either technically or morally, or if there a better way of doing and why it’s better