“There’s an old saying in Tennessee—I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee—that says, ‘Fool me once, shame on…shame on you.’ Fool me—you can’t get fooled again.”

There will be another, but as you imply it isn’t hereditary. The next one will have to build their own following. Which may be easier with all the groundwork laid from this one.

Am I misreading this? He thinks there would be less “false” journalism coverage if reporters shot more senators?

I mean, I guess? By shooting senators you’d shut off a valve of significant disinformation…

I believe getting rid of innate alignments was the right choice. The racism might have been why, but the issue I always took with it was the alignments being too broad and ill-defined.

Sphinxes or lamia. The cruel intelligence of man with the refined predatory abilities of felids/snakes. What a match!

On the other hand, a severe degradation of federal institutions would by necessity promote community-based cooperation. Like in any other disaster, natural or otherwise.

Nobody wants to see it happen this way, but it might be the catalyst we get.

As opposed to transgender mechanical men.

Praise the Omnissiah!

Bold of you to assume I didn’t build my battlestation around the shitter.

Not in backwater Alabama. Gotta wait for the day of.

The Zionists, whose explicit aims were to found a Jewish state in Palestine (what would later be Israel), were the targets as far back as the Ottoman control of the area.

Even terror attacks such as the Munich Massacre were pretty specifically targetting Israeli expatriats.

Mostly my beef is with the conflation of Jewish and Israeli. They do not represent all Jews, and any conflation of those distinct groups should be put down.

The peasantry?

I think you want the fourth estate.

Murder Jews or Israelis?

If their goal is to murder Jews, they’d have an easier time of it most anywhere else.

I think the word you want is universally. Unilaterally could mean that just one side viewed it as ok.

This was my takeaway as well. They’re not agreeing with Smith for any reason other than this nets them more discretionary power.

You have the choice of a conservative who supports more guns, increased aid to Israel, and a more closed border.

Or the party of Donald Trump.

I blame the English for not having accents like the Latin languages.

When the radios are passed over during this conflict, they’ll still be dangerous in the following period where children will get them.

They still are, but they gotta move the needle back there gradually. It’s not in vogue to restrict women to feminine roles just now.

Enkidu. Dude was pivotal in providing companionship to the king that stopped, or at least slowed, his general rape and molestation of the lower classes.

The apostrophe as conjunction of “___ is” is acceptable. Eg: he’s being pendantic.

Unless the word being conjoined is “it”.