I see, I think it’s clear enough now. Never noticed if that happened to me too, but yes, since you got that consistently, it definitely deserves to be discussed
When I install anything through wine/proton, the apps on the screen lose their focus
With “the apps” here you mean the Linux apps, right?
When I bring up an app into focus from the panel, it shows behind whatever app that is already on the screen.
Also here I’m confused if you’re referring to Linux or Windows apps.
Beside that, for potential bug reports like this, I think you’ll get more/better responses over at the KDE forum as stated in the page about bug reporting https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting
Oh I get it now, for me that’s not a problem since I’m also in the EU, but I can see why it’s an issue, I do have a VPN too, but barely use it
I see.
tor has geo location issues.
Could you explain what you mean with this? I’m not sure I understand
mullvad for looking shit up on ecommerce sites with new ID each time
Is it sufficient? I’d always assumed it was easily targetable with the IP so I started using TOR for that purpose
Why use git exactly? You’re never changing the content of the files themselves (excluding the effect of lossy compression) so you also don’t need to track those changes, right?
This seems more like a job for rsync.
Aside from that, I don’t know more for how to achieve the full setup you’re trying to create, sorry
The tool presents a significant privacy risk, and shows that people may not be as anonymous in the YouTube comments sections as they may think.
I don’t understand how this makes the privacy on YouTube any worse when all the information it sources from is already public, this is just automated doxxing, which, while we’ll agree to be unethical, was never a privacy violation, it is just the consequence of the actions of who posted the information to begin with.
Also does it really violate YouTube’s privacy policy?
It’s new to me that service consumers can be subject to the policy when it’s not the third parties that YouTube actively sends the information to, that sounds more to me like Terms of service, which are hardly enforceable fully (thank goodness, so we can have our yt-dlp and PipePipe)
Yes, this is beyond Pokémon level
I never understood the appeal of Glitch honestly, so I never used it. Is there any user here that can pitch in with their experience?
Guess not, not yet at least
It’s now just a bash
Lmaoo, Italian here too, I never had the pleasure to see that slip up, where have you seen it on usually?
Based.
The universe is my IDE, my hands are my editor.
That looks interesting, I see it’s been discontinued 2 years ago though, is there a maintained fork that you use?
That’s different, it’s technically possible not to comply with that statement because the location data is sent and stored, it takes just not deleting it to violate that, it just evaluates to a pinky promise that has to be verified by inspecting their systems.
This, on the other hand, is a technically verifiable claim, the code is open and it all runs locally on the same machine, the TEE will give the green light and that’s how apps will accept your biometric verification, the only thing that might be suspicious is with the implementation of the TEE, I don’t know if every manufacturer keeps the data it gets on the device or secretly communicates outside, this unknown is also a good reason to use a Google Pixel device if you care about that
Google Pixel phones use a TEE OS called Trusty which is open source, unlike many other phones.
From the Privacy Guides Mobile phones page
I’m all for not giving more data points where it’s not needed, but is this as bad it seems? All biometric data remains stored on the device, it isn’t sent to Google, or any app for that matter, that’s how the API works
Bro is so committed to the repo bit that he made me cry
Love this response, I guess technology is that thing that comes out of what we describe as thought, to say what a thought is gets even harder though
Let the Zucc feel the heat