Since you don’t believe that, I suppose you won’t believe the article where he’s changed his mind.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5291877-trump-tax-increase-rich/

" to raise the tax rate on the highest earners and the other to close the so-called carried interest loophole, according to a Republican leadership source, as well as two other GOP sources familiar with the call."

To try to get Democrats on board? Or if the Dems vote against it, to use as campaign fodder?

That’s what I thought, too, But according to that law firm’s (https://cornerstonelaw.us/22nd-amendment-doesnt-say-think-says/) article,

While the Amendment’s drafters spilled extra ink ensuring that someone who is elevated to the Presidency for more than two years of another President’s term due to that other President’s death or removal from office, it does nothing to clarify that one who is elected twice cannot rise to the Presidency again. In short, if the 22nd Amendment’s purpose was to ensure that there was a 10 year maximum on service for anyone regardless of how they became President, it could have said so.

and with our Supreme Court in his pocket…

https://cornerstonelaw.us/22nd-amendment-doesnt-say-think-says/