- 2 Posts
- 678 Comments
You should look up a lot of things
0·8 months ago5th Circuit
Me: Better get ready for some bullshit.
0·8 months agoThis is Core Inflation in the OP. It’s actual a basket of baskets of goods.
This is why I come to Lemmy — for people with even a passing understanding of the topics on which there speak confidently.
It’s like Microsoft doesn’t care if the home user’s personal computer runs Windows; because they don’t care.
No. Next question.
This cost compounding pharmacies about one batch of drugs. Anyone with any sophistication just added some B6 into the next batch and went back to business as usual.
Ahh yes, unlike all those non-capitalist modern nations with their complete lack of widespread insidious surveillance.
Happy to help! And, I totally feel you on the ragdoll thing. I’ve got a lot of dollars in loans in repayment from law school and it would be nice to just be able to work on a budget that I knew wasn’t going to change drastically in a few months (again).
You’ve actually stated one of the main reasons that TROs are issued. One of the required showings by the petitioning party is to demonstrate “imminent” and “irreparable harm.” In this case the imminent is shown by the plan’s policies and planned implementation as well as the fact that there was a date promulgated for commencement. Irreparable harm would be demonstrated by something similar to your scenario – the petitioner would argue that if it goes into effect and the final determination is that it should not have been permitted to go into effect, that monies which should have been rightfully collected are forever lost, absent an otherwise unnecessary affirmative and costly process of collecting on the marginal difference of payments owed.
To more directly answer your question, the court would direct the companies to collect in a manner which is least onerous to both parties (debtor and creditor); likely a long period of increased collections or (IMHO, more likely) extending the payment period to collect the now-again additional amount due.
I agree with you though, I think given the circumstances and gravity to individual debtors in this case the prudent thing is to stay implementation of the program.
It’s both. The case is being transferred and the program can go into effect (unless the new venue issues a TRO).
Me too, buddy. Me too.
It’s not moving the race, at all. It may affect the VP candidates’ approval rating.
Exactly like XP, Vista was horrible until a couple of service packs. Then it was better than XP SP2 and release Windows 7.
Th OP article is the Senate, you’re right. The House is the easier fix, though.
Yet another reason to increase the size of the House to 1000 members.
Nah, fuck Asus.