Hi friend! Without knowing your history, what jobs you’ve applied for in the past. Try looking at fraud prevention jobs with credit card companies or at banks. Other companies may also have fraud departments. That’s a very adjacent field for cybersecurity and would be easy to sell that experience.

I think you’ve just described an Alzheimer’s care center. Buwhahah. Honestly appropriate.

The difference is this would be legal.

There’s no difference with a broken court and we can’t fix that with our current Congress.

I know you’re arguing against fixing stuff,

What the hell are you on about about? Like actually what. You need to call down with that nonsense. Why are you being so combative? I’m not even the person you were first talking to.

To my knowledge there has never been a federal judge removed in anyway other than impeachment. You would have to take an untested claim to court, prove it, then still to apply that process to remove judges case by case after. Unfortunately, it’s not us that gets to decide whether or not something is legal, it’s up to the “supreme” Court. I just can’t see us convincing 6 of those justices to accept consequences for their and their party’s actions. This would be a hell of a legal long shot.

Alternatively, and possibly almost as useful, companies will end up training their AI to detect AI content so that they don’t train on AI content. Which would in turn would give everyone a tool to filter out AI content. Personally, I really like the apps that poison images when they’re uploaded to the internet.

I’m fine with just the security updates until 2025. I’m sure I’ll eventually be able to move on to Linux by then.

As an owner of a plug-in hybrid this is patently incorrect. Most electric car owners have at most of 240 volt outlet (in the US), which while can fill your battery in a few hours from home, still falls short of the half hour round trip to gas station and back. Maybe with time our infrastructure and technology will get to that point though.

deleted by creator

I’m sorry, but isn’t this the exact definition of what they themselves call “grooming”?

Thank you for elaborating. That sounds better reasoned than the first comment. I suspect the original comment you had replied to was lamenting that there were only 2 per state and not proportionate to population. I learned a new word today: Bicameral. I appreciate your reply!

Out of curiosity, what’s the reason?

I don’t feel like he needs to be convicted though. It’s already been determined in court that he participated in the insurrection. The law doesn’t say he needs to be convicted either, only participate; It’s an automatic disqualifier. The criminal conviction would be a separate thing.

They probably have businesses across state lines they’ve invested in, and want to keep traffic funnelling out of state.

I really missed this too, until I discovered that with Sync, you can long press comments to close the chain. I don’t really use social media at all on my computer anymore. Which I guess has been better for my mental health

Removed by mod

There’s a lot of Musk hate all over the Internet and irl, not just this site. For good reasons too, but I don’t think the issue is that he didn’t testify, it’s because he wants regulators to be punished for enforcing regulations. That kind of attitude screams “I am above the law, punish these people so no one tries to hold me accountable again.” to me.

people shouldn’t be out to try to change everybody’s opinions on everything all the time?

Why are you trying to change my opinion on changing other people’s opinion?

I don’t owe it to everyone reading my comments to explain my complete thoughts

Oh, i guess you won’t answer that. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

And I just want to get off the train…