• 6 Posts
  • 219 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle


  • I don’t want to sound judgmental. I’ve never been in your position.

    One potential way to approach this would be to “bring the shelter staff on the juorney”.

    • Tell them as soon as you confirm the job.
    • Thank them for their support.
    • Explain that you will be getting some equipment, and that you will need to connect it to Ethernet.
    • Give them the great news, that you have organised housing for yourself, once that first paycheck comes in.
    • Let them feel yes excitement, at the prospect of getting some momentum in your life.
    • If they express concern, invite them to sit with you while you work, show them you are trustworthy.

    This is a people problem, not a technical one. People that run shelters, especially volunteers, a good people. But they likely have been burned in the past; they will not blindly trust.


  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nztoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlDo you believe in free will?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    It is not really weird, OP is arguing that the universe itself is deterministic. Taking a mechanistic approach to refuting that claim is perfectly valid.

    There are a myriad of examples of physical processes that are chaotic, this invalidates OP’s claim.

    To address the morality point, if God is the source of goodness and morality; beyond the question of “which God?” ; it means objective morality doesn’t exist, because God can change it’s mind about what is “good”.

    But that is a discussion finds a different threat.


  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nztoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlDo you believe in free will?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    OK let’s just start with the assertion that there of a casual link back to the beginning of time.

    We will begin with the big one first. We don’t even know if time had a beginning.

    If we assume that time began at the instant of the big bang. There is no plausible link between my bean induced fart, and some random energy fluctuation, there are just too many chaotic interactions between then and now.

    There are so many things we don’t know, making the extremely bold claim that free will doesn’t exist, is dangerously naive.

    We can’t even solve Navier-Stokes; neuronal interaction is so far beyond what we are currently capable of, it’s ridiculous.

    My recommendation to anyone contemplating this question. Assume free will exists; if you are wrong, it will made no difference; you were destined to believe that anyway.


  • The stock market is chaos, driven by bias and a bunch of unknown and unknowable variables.

    A simple example with 3 players.

    • P1 thinks stock A is a good buy (for whatever reason) at $1/unit. P1 decides to buy putting upward pressure on the price.
    • P2 has been holding a bunch of A for a while and has a number ($1) in mind to sell at, P1 can’t know this information. This sale puts downward pressure on the price.
    • If P1 & P2 have the same number of shares, the pressures are equal, and the price doesn’t move. If they don’t the price moves either up or down.
    • P3 has been watching A, sees that it moves and decides that this is a good time to buy, (going down its a bargain, going up its on the rise get in early), putting further upward pressure on the stock.

    Each action by the different players causes something to happen to the price, no-one can know all the internal thought patterns of all the other interested parties, and thus can never have perfect information. And even with perfect information, it may not be possible to predict, as some stocks interact in non-predictable ways.

    e.g. Nvidia goes up, TSMC usually goes up, but not always. TSMC going down can be caused by Nvidia, but also thousands of other things also.

    Conclusion: can the stock market be predicted? General trends - Yes, specific stock movements - No!




  • Not really, i first used Linux in 2001 or 3… It’s been some time. I think it was fedora 1. I was 21/3.

    First installed Linux in 2008, Ubuntu 8.04 and started daily driving Ubuntu 10.04 in late 2010.

    Since then I’ve used a lot of different distros, I’m now running mint.

    In saying that, my son has only had Linux (and Chromebooks at school), I got him to help install his own system, he was 7 at the time.











  • A few years ago, I installed mint 21.1 on my mum’s old NUC; a 2013 model; was running Win7.

    I said, it doesn’t meet the minimum for Win10, so it was either buy something new or try Linux.

    Just got back from visiting them, I updated it to 21.3, still running fine. It still does everything they need.

    Mum even said, “it always just works”. A great endorsement, as a non-technical user mum needs a no fuss distro, mint works so well in this regard.