Looks like they got that number from this quote from another arstechnica article ”…OpenAI admitted that its AI Classifier was not “fully reliable,” correctly identifying only 26 percent of AI-written text as “likely AI-written” and incorrectly labeling human-written works 9 percent of the time”

Seems like it mostly wasn’t confident enough to make a judgement, but 26% it correctly detected ai text and 9% incorrectly identified human text as ai text. It doesn’t tell us how often it labeled AI text as human text or how often it was just unsure.

EDIT: this article https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/openai-discontinues-its-ai-writing-detector-due-to-low-rate-of-accuracy/

Probably money. Given enough money, I’m sure tiktok will ban any search term

Woah there. This is a political post on a social media site.

You better stop with those non rage inducing comments.

This reminds me of a saying an old programming mentor told me.

“To a kid with a hammer, everything is a nail”

I don’t think they want to do that anyway. If fox isn’t being put on blast, CNN is next.

There are no consequences for just about anything if you have enough money :)

What “things in html, css, and js” does Firefox not support that prevents you from using it?

WebGPU has been the biggest one for me, but most sites don’t even use it.

I mean if you want to be all sensible about it, sure.

It’s just a tool. The real scam is that the 1% pay such a low share of their actual income (including capital gains)

BuT coORPEratIOns arE PeOplE

“In collectives” gives me big brave new world vibes.

Literally the comment I was going to write

Bias and obvious bias

Income tax

You have no idea why? Really? It’s to get people thinking about / trying bing.

It’s all advertising.

We’re going to enter another search engine (read chatbot) war.

Governments like to assume that once something is illegal , it’ll just stop within their borders

I don’t think you’re right about nvidia. Their hardware is used for SO much more than AI. They’re fine.

Plus their own AI products are popping off rn. DLSS and their frame generation one (I forget the name) are really popular in the gaming space.

I think they also have a new DL-based process for creating stencils for silicon photolithography which, in my limited knowledge, seems like a huge deal.

Yeah but the headline should let me know what the story is and make me interested. Not make me think the author is complaining that their SSD died.

I don’t care about that. I don’t want to read an article about that.

They should’ve made a better headline

Idk all the details of the current wotc controversy train, but If an AI generates a base image that gets refined by a human, is not that human-created?

Plus like you know that $60 isn’t for the art or the time it took to make the art. It’s for the Dnd brand.

They’d charge $60 even if it was made in an afternoon

But…. Isn’t most art made on computers nowadays?