

They think free speech means no one is allowed to disagree with them. Otherwise they say their right to free speech is being violated.
They think free speech means no one is allowed to disagree with them. Otherwise they say their right to free speech is being violated.
He did at the inauguration.
Excellent. Good to know that some young people have intelligence and principles.
Absolutely.
…and fuck them up badly, in many ways, and in more than one country. Yes.
Trump supports Putin because he’s idiotic. A less stupid and chaotic leader would be able to tell the difference between someone who gives them a compliment and someone who is a friend to the USA.
Not if Trump is elected, it won’t!
This is really weird. You’re happy for Trump to be elected because Cheney is so bad?!?
This is nonsense. Putin and Trump are allies.
Fascism 2025 it is then. You’ve made your choice.
Because the other person didn’t do insane arithmetic between polls in a way that counted some people as three people then defend it three times before backing down, and then refuse to admit for another 24 hours that their logic was flawed.
I don’t recall anyone saying they were Harris supporters. Why would they vote third party if they supported Harris?! No, the people you’re arguing with just said that they dislike Trump. I honestly don’t know why you find that hard to believe.
At no point have you made a coherent argument based on them, though.
Are you willing to admit that polling data is unreliable and that it’s nonsense to do arithmetic on results from separate pools? If not, there’s no basis for engaging with you because you’ll just repeat the same nonsense with poll after poll until you luck out on one that is less obviously misleading.
Fascism 2025 it is then. You’ve made your choice.
I’m not going to engage with your gish gallop.
I don’t know what you mean by gish
Then look up gish gallop.
I’m not quoting any one poll as gospel, either.
Says the person who did arithmetic with poll data from different polls that made no logical sense whatever.
Out of interest, whose side do you think I’m on?
Well, I’m going to ask you a question that you have been ducking for over twelve hours: can one person be three, or were your reasoning, logic, and conclusions based on misuse of inconsistent and unreliable polling data?
Your attempt to get me to take part in a rehash of the same logic with different data is futile. Your logic is nonsense.
It’s not a fing negotiation, it’s a chance to avert fascism for four more years and you don’t care. You just don’t fing care.
I always thought that NaN is required by IEEE rules to never equal any other number, including itself, because you can make NaN in different ways and this shouldn’t result in equality or something, so C is wild but not javascript’s fault.
The other three being true is definitely javascript’s insane fault, though.