

Are you sure “fixed” is the correct word?
Are you sure “fixed” is the correct word?
More like a for profit arm ruled by an non profit head.
it would be a bit like the adult version of Home Alone
Ah. So Skyfall then
You are given a calf-skin wallet on your birthday…
I’ve stayed in one in Osaka. You don’t have access to clothes or belongings during your stay. It’s a lot like staying on a space ship without the travel.
News reposts can add value.
True. The next iteration doesn’t need to be optimal, just an improvement in the loss function.
Not sure how they would decide when to stop.
Proof of work need not be useless. E.g. https://primecoin.io/
The tricky bit is finding a problem that is hard to solve but easy to verify. I’m not sure AI tasks fall into that category.
The transaction verification is separate to the work.
… Aww. Why did the story stop?
If it’s mounted, what’s the difference?
What are speed pants?
Oh. My mistake.
Familiarity breeds attempt.
Jane Sherwood Ace
Royalties were not part of the original design.
Right click. Save as.
Also note that the ERC721 standard says nothing about royalties. Royaltiew weren’t designed as a “key feature”
neither has any plans to accept the other’s NFTs.
However, NFTs that are accepted by both will have higher value.
but the game itself doesn’t care.
We are starting seeing this on Roblox and Fortnite where skins can pass through to different games. .
As soon as either company crashes and goes bankrupt, everything connected will become useless and lose most or all value. Thus, blockchain wouldn’t fix the issue.
That’s exactly what blockchain is fixing. E.g. Your valuable skins don’t disappear when the company running the game you play goes bankrupt.
That’s the theory. Games companies are at the private blockchain stage but there are some small web3 game developers.
Yeah. I could try pihole. I think that works well in general but now YouTube ads and videos come from the same servers.
Is that possible on webOS?
Steam cards are a good example. Imagine if stream went bankrupt. Wouldn’t be an issue with Blockchain.
Thus could mean that 69% of revenues go to rights holders A and B and 1% of revenues are spread between holders C - Z.