Using a filesystem which has NONE of modern features because you “noticed” performance tradeoffs…

Encryption in btrfs? https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs#Encryption

mpv, yt-dlp or FREETUBE, although yt-dlp now works better with cookie export from a browser. mpv is life.

kind of, mpv

mpv

Who on linux is playing videos in the browser??

did they fix the encryption bullshit which makes it impossible to see external content when using encryption? Therefore I have to read such emails on my android version of thunderbird facepalm deluxe

I don’t understand what this topic is about…

I also have AMD and do updates regularly and didn’t have this issue, but I think the problem is pretty apparent and has been for quite some time. Packman repository should not be used by non-knowledgeable users! I am not exactly sure what that means for daily use, but as seen here it creates issues if you are not aware what an update actually does or just press “yes, yes, yes” to all questions in an update process.

In regards to plymouth I have no clue, but it seems this should be easily manageable by booting into a previous snapshot?

Is this fakenews or is my tumbleweed install at home hardened… any TW users here heard of this?

Totally agree with OP, this also works with different editors like Helix.

your late to the party

This is nvidia exclusive right?

Here just a reading comprehension for my take

Its a security focused distribution aimed at developers which want to understand the workings of an OS

On which you answered:

You’re just wrong.

So idk whats your point either.

You first sentence actually supports my previous statement, that OpenBSD is aimed at developers. :)

Why would I “untighten” the hardening and not just use an OS which is more suited to my needs? Even for privacy, which is much more relevant for normal usage, there are better alternatives to OpenBSD.

I did this once for their music player, that bug trackers is hell…I can’t even find my original report, but there is enough for a lifetime: https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?component=general&product=Elisa&resolution=---

Just because people doing it doesn’t mean its the best thing to do. Also how can I be wrong, you can disagree with me. Obviously I am stating my opinion on this matter. But so far I haven’t seen any real arguments from your side contradicting what I said.

A bit late, but wow openbsd developers use their own distro as a desktop, you convinced me. And yes I know it might sound weird but openbsd has a special use case. Its a security focused distribution aimed at developers which want to understand the workings of an OS. Its also used as a base for some router specific operating systems.

Everybody who used OpenBSD on the desktop knows it has its shortcomings compared to any other OS if your workload extends beyond simply checking mails and surfing the web.

has no special use case. Its hardened and comparably slower than Net- and FreeBSD

😂

I have used all 3 major BSDs (Free, Open and Net). FreeBSD is ideal for servers due to its performance. OpenBSD is perfect for security appliances and NetBSD is perfect if you have exotic legacy hardware.

Funny that those descriptions contradict what these Distro actually aim to do. NetBSD is a the supposed performance oriented distro. FreeBSD should be able to do both, desktop and server. But your are on point with OpenBSD.