You already answered your own question, bud.

it doesn’t make sense TO ME. Based on what I was taught

Why do you think other people are different than you?

Dude, that’s the dev…

What’s really funny is that he still could’ve faked it. Like, it would be simple to talk on face cam while someone else plays. This showcases his deep narcissism that he is buying his own pathetic hype.

Wittle baby doesn’t want the meany-weany comedian to hurt is fee-fees while he destroys the country.

Not liking racist ≠ " I love [insert corporation here]". More than one bad thing can exist in the world simultaneously.

“Fight”. Far be it that we don’t turn everything into a zero-sum “war” 🙄. Can the SD community please not carry over the same console war bullshit just because it’s kinda-sorta similar to the switch? That shit is so lame.

I can’t help but figure it’d be cheaper to custom build a device instead of stripping down a Steam Deck. I suppose it was probably gotten used, but still.

Hey bud, when you blurt out what you think “privately”, it’s no longer private, and people not liking what was said publicly isn’t “thought policing”.

Secondly, Protons actions include supporting this wackjob’s “private” thoughts.. Even by your asinine rubric, they’re allowed to be judged on that.

LDS former NASA engineer that makes silly devices and gadgets. Some interesting videos, though he’s big into the clickbait game. Seems at least relatively sincere in his push for encouraging interest in STEM with children, though he can be a bit “flash over substance” for my tastes. But he is better then a lot of others I’ve seen in that regard.

Its not about the inclusion of a character, but about how a specific scene with that character is handled.

You didn’t read my comment, did you? Like the part where I specifically mention that? I don’t care if the scene was shot on a camcorder for a student created after-school special on a PTA budget. Acting like that’s the problem instead of any of the reactionary bullshit to it is not the viewpoint of someone who truly cares about these populations. Where’s the “helpful” article about shitty hetero romance scenes in countless movies/shows/games and how we should do better there? Those don’t cause a blip. But this? This is a “problem”. Fuck that.

and doesn’t even use the games existing lore for transgender people but instead uses modern terminology.

This reads like those losers that rage about black people in The Witcher because it’s “noT hIStoRIcaLlY AccuRAtE”. Bemoaning “modern terminology” is so pointless. They’re also speaking modern languages through the majority of the game. Gonna write a Forbes “article” about that, too?

I just want to voice my opinion that not every article about video games needs to be shared/promoted, particularly gamergate-lite shit like this. “Only” whinging about how non-cis white male characters are included in games is hardly any better than the chuds bombing the game on metacritic.

I’d also argue this violates your own sub’s rule (rule 9), not because it’s about “political” genders, but for explicitly calling peoples’ existence “political messaging”.

This was my first thought too, hah.

The problem is you forgot to account for bad faith actors and their army of idiots.

inb4 trump rant online about it. Dude doesn’t give a shit about the country, but ratings? That hurts him.

If you’re going to argue in bad faith, you should at the very least understand the words in the comment and how they are being used.

While an insightful suggestion, this presupposes that they won’t figuratively or literally throw out the constitution before that point.

I’m not saying he’s lying, but maybe give it a moment before rewarding someone for doing basic damage control after doing/saying something heinous. Redemption isn’t an instantaneous process.

It’s a bite to the wallet to get a decent chair, but definitely worth it, and can still be done for sub-$1000 too.

He definitely hates them because of those reasons and nothing else that they possibly have in common. Just those things.

You’re getting downvotes because people disagree with you, but you posted a source and you explained yourself in good faith. That gets an upvote, imo.