

it doesn’t seem to be server specific because once prompted there is no way to use the account again, even if you decided to just not use a server that may have these settings set.
it doesn’t seem to be server specific because once prompted there is no way to use the account again, even if you decided to just not use a server that may have these settings set.
no, you’re also effectively locked out of any participation unless you provide an email address and phone number, which they won’t even tell you about in advance but use dark patterns and gaslighting that they noticed “suspicious activity” to step by step first ask you for an email and then once that is validated they prompt you for a phone number. the only thing they don’t do yet is ask for ID.
this is probably somehow related to changes introduced somewhere in 0.19.4, I’ve been seeing this for months at this point, as we’ve been on a 0.19.4 pre-release relatively early due to done federation issues
if you’re not community banned you might still be instance banned on the community instance, which wouldn’t show up in your local instances modlog if the ban happened on a <0.19.4 instance. if the methods pointed out by other comments here fail I suggest you visit the instance of the community and check the site modlog there, searching for your user.
i suspect you’re referring to your post to a lemmy.ml community and you have indeed been instance banned there for a limited amount of time.
I can sell you a copy of lemmys source code, are you interested?
sure they do, you’re one of them
you can enable end to end encryption, it’s optional. I don’t think it’s enabled by default.
won’t be the case for much longer, the next lemmy release is removing that.
i suggest you remove this quote and summarize it with fewer details if you need to have it there in the first place. you’re effectively advertising for them now and undoing the moderator action of removing this advertisement.
fwiw, every week or so there is a scheduled task that permanently overwrites contents of deleted comments.
fyi @freamon@lemmy.world
it sure is possible, but not with the amount of work anyone would be willing to put into it.
i don’t want to go to all that effort
nearly all talks are either in English or have English translations. not sure if they’re available on YouTube but you should be able to find everything on https://media.ccc.de
your app seems to be doing weird things then.
the original comment is by user @soundingcock@lemm.ee
, who spams links to gore in comments.
you can just turn it off, see https://help.kagi.com/kagi/settings/general.html
based on https://help.apple.com/xcode/mac/current/#/deve2819c518 it seems like users may need to explicitly enable sharing crash data with app developers.
I don’t know what the default for this is.
https://help.apple.com/xcode/mac/current/#/dev9a80ab71d seems to imply that you need to distribute your app via app store or testflight to be able to receive crash reports.
the majority of apps installed on my mac are not installed via app store, though many of them have app store variants.
i don’t know if the distribution channel matters or just having the app in app store is enough.
this article however also explicitly states this, so it appears that you do indeed by default not send this data to app developers:
users who download your app from the App Store will need to agree to share crash and usage data with developers.
I’m pretty sure this only goes to Apple, not to the actual developer.
I believe I’ve even seen devs specifically ask for copies of the reports from the crash reporter, as they wouldn’t receive them otherwise.
this doesn’t change the rest of your statement though, just afaik the recipient is different.
if you’re renaming from File.js
to file.ts
, which is also changing suffixes instead of just capitalization, then that couldn’t be explained by case sensitivity, unless it was a typo and you meant File.js
to file.js
I’ve been using case insensitive fs on macOS for years and the only software having issues with this is onedrive.
can’t say i’m surprised.
in my experience it becomes hidden even from admins, at least on the instance it was removed on. i’ve seen this both on a remote user with remote content and also on a local user with remote content from the admin perspective and in neither case i still see any content on the user’s profile.
you can also just check
dpkg -L $installed_package_name | grep /etc/apt/
to find files that would have been installed by the package there.