I’m not Swedish, but I’m proud of them, too!

I agree, and did not mean to imply they had any good intentions. Just that it wasn’t pure malicious, evil on their part. They should have been transparent, and offered better solutions to users. They certainly could afford to do so.

Thank you for appreciating my contribution. :) And to answer your question, because it happens too fast. Everything powers on, the voltage drops below a critical point, the CPU forgets who it is or where it is, and the reboot begins. I’m sure nowadays they make efforts to anticipate this. But back then, the industry was busy cramming increasingly powerful hardware into devices, and no one had really given any thought to how the batteries would react after years of use. Then environmental factors could make everything worse - coldness can suck dozens of percent off even a healthy battery.

Sadly, very few people seem to understand this. I’m all for seeing a big company have to take responsibility, but the way people just blindly follow this is very disheartening. You can’t have true accountability without accuracy. They hear “throttling old phones” and assume the rest. The supreme irony is, throttling was the only way to keep older devices running longer. When I was doing kernel development on the Note2 and Note4, people constantly reported sudden reboots or otherwise rapidly depleting battery while using the camera. The old batteries just couldn’t handle the sudden spike in demand for near 100% CPU/GPU utilization + full display brightness + camera hardware powered on + heavy RAM/IO use, all at once. So the voltage would drop, even for just a few milliseconds, then the CPU would starve, and the device would reboot. Just like pressing the reset button on a PC. Limiting the CPU was the easiest solution for everyone. Do I think they should have done it silently? No. Do I think they did it to avoid being thrust into the spotlight when more and more of their users were reporting reboots? Yes. I think modern devices handle this much better because they learned from the past. Manufacturers didn’t realize back then what the degradation curve would be years into the future against acute spikes in battery demands.

The thing is, there’s nothing wrong with sharing knowledge or pointing out best practices. What sucks is people replying JUST to point out the flaws and then gloat, without even fully comprehending what happened in the article. But this behavior has been around way longer than reddit.

I remember when it was FutureSplash Animator, and my young mind was blown by the possibilities of animations in only a few kb.

Don’t forget, the Note4 even had a fairly easy to replace aluminum outer frame/bumper.

I’ve used nothing but Firefox on all desktops/laptops since 2004. I really don’t understand how or why anyone would switch away.

$20 to remove ads, $100 for Ultra.

“The pun is coming from inside the building!”

I believe that policy was reduced or removed many years ago. Around the time when all the cool new projects stopped, and Google scrubbed “don’t be evil” from their site and company philosophy.

Imagine the confusion when people order a “Big O”.

Yeah… But maybe not ANYONE… “Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has already registered an ‘X’ logo in connection to ‘online social networking services’ and ‘social networking services in the fields of entertainment, gaming, and application development.’”

Kinda like the names of his kids.

vYv_El0n_vYv

There are many other email providers besides gmail out there…

That would have been a fantastic idea, tbh.

Wow, flashback to 25 years ago!

Not that anyone asked, but if you’re looking for an amazing weather widget with a timeline style, check out Meteogram. It’s one of the best, most customizable widget I’ve ever seen. Not affiliated, just been a happy user for 3 years now!

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cloud3squared.meteogram