Just like they asked you to upgrade to ie in the 90s a d early 00s.

So garbage in garbage out.

The position of NATO general secretary is irrelevant, the actual treaty is irrelevant, in the end military action is always a political choice of member states.

The worrisome part of course is that Mark Rütte was leader of an EU country for 14 years. There are certain to be people loyal to the USA in EU politics and military after all those year of US alignment. Heck Russia has managed to buy a few EU politicians in a couple of decades.

And your employer or husband would like to be over your shoulder because they don’t trust you.

There’s a reason the vote is secret.

Yes Stalin famously implemented an electoral college.

The only reasonable explanation for an American to support the EC is claim it’s democratic is him being a Stalinist or a Russian sock puppet.

Couldn’t be an American internalizing USA’s own jingoistic propaganda about how it is the most democratic and free state etc.

Always somebody else’s fault.

It’s racism, due to his political alignment he can’t go after black people but Russians are fair game.

I just read your list and it confirms mine.

Small buffer AND can’t skip ahead on a boring video because you can only get served the ads to unlock further video after time equal to the served video duration has passed.

That is not YouTube, it’s online TV and there will be an impact on the product. Preloading a video via a 3rd party client will still easily beat this scheme. Just get a headstart equal to the first ad break.

Sure if you fundamentally change what YouTube you can make it work.

You need very small buffers or complete disablement of seeking even outside of ads. Otherwise a client can reconstruct the video without viewer interruption.

People however expect to be able to skip ahead in YouTube videos, otherwise its just TV.

That’s a lie.

The original Sony feature did not give access to all the hardware and thus it was not possible to play ps3 games on it.

Their ban actually motivated people to crack Sony’s measures and install Linux with full access to the hardware.

sudo -i

As long as a standard “unblessed” usb-c cable will work fully with the phone it’s non-issue.

Yes they do.

Which is why you want an agreement to make them liable for copyright infringement (plagiarism is not a crime itself).

You would have to pay for distributing copyright infringing material whether created by AI or humans or just straight up copied.

I don’t care if AI will be used,commercially or otherwise.

I am worried about further limitations being placed upon the general public (not “creatives”/publishers/AI corps) either by reinterpretation of existing laws, amendment of existing laws or legislation of brand new rights (for copyright holders/creators, not the general public).

I don’t even care who wins, the “creatives” or tech/AI, just that we don’t get further shafted.

You need a very specific prompt to make a copy. Even to just be similar enough you have to put the proper input and try a lot of repetitions.

That’s why the right holders are going after the training which included copying by the AI corpos.

In your dream land right holders could just prompt the AI till it spit something close to their work and sue the AI corp for that. Repeat as needed ; infinite money glitch.

Obviously it doesn’t work that way.

Neither are AI vendors. We have locally hosted AI models and they don’t contain what they output. You can tell by the actual size.

Nope. The output is based on the users input in both cases.

It’s not stealing, its not even ‘piracy’ which also is not stealing.

Copyright laws need to be scaled back, to not criminalize socially accepted behavior, not expand.

Operating system have been used to commit copyright infringement much more effectively and massively by copying copyrighted material verbatim.

OS vendors are not liable, the people who make and distribute the copies are. The same applies for Word processors, image editors etc.

You are for a massive expansion on the scope of copyright limiting the freedoms of the general public not just AI corps or tech corps.

It’s not a breach of copyright or other IP law not to cite sources on your paper.

Getting your paper rejected for lacking sources is also not infringing in your freedom. Being forced to pay damages and delete your paper from any public space would be infringement of your freedom.

The decision is that even lending out ebooks against owned copies is illegal

What the IA may be illegal but is certainly not wrong.

Ubuntu Wiki Ask Ubuntu Ubuntu Forums

The wiki has some information and should correspond to how Ubuntu specifically is configured. You can ask for ubuntu specific help in those communities. You can also ask here and on several Linux communities on Lemmy.

The Arch Wiki I find to be more in depth than the ubuntu wiki. Of course some things may differ from Ubuntu’s defaults but I found it a useful resource when using Ubuntu.

Finally I suggest you learn a bit about how Linux works in general, what is in what directory, what is wayland and xorg, understand how drives are named etc and some understanding of the terminal (moving around in directories, how to use sudo etc, no need to learn to make bash scripts).