

wait till you see
if __name__ = "__main__":
main()
`
wait till you see
if __name__ = "__main__":
main()
`
If you do it through AI you can still learn. After all I go through the code to understand what is going on. And for not so complex tasks LLMs are good at commenting the code (though it can bullshit from time to time so you have to approach it critically).
But anyways the stuff I ask LLMs are generally just one off tasks. If I need to use something more frequently, I do prefer reading stuff for more in depth understanding.
I am on you with this one. It is also very helpful in argument heavy libraries like plotly. If I ask a simple question like “in plotly how do I do this and that to the xaxis” etc it generally gives correct answers, saving me having to do internet research for 5-10 minutes or read documentations for functions with 1000 inputs. I even managed to get it to render a simple scene of cloud of points with some interactivity in 3js after about 30 minutes of back and forth. Not knowing much javascript, that would take me at least a couple hours. So yeah it can be useful as an assistant to someone who already knows coding (so the person can vet and debug the code).
Though if you weigh pros and cons of how LLMs are used (tons of fake internet garbage, tons of energy used, very convincing disinformation bots), I am not convinced benefits are worth the damages.
Glad, I am not the only one seeing Saddam Hussain everywhere
Link should have been
C:\Desktop\my_cool_website.html
Eric Adams who is a member of the Democrat party. They are all in this for the seat and the power unfortunately.
he means he doesn’t know the definition of constitution
pray in production
oh yes he can be, just look at that face
It is not, not useful. Don’t throw a perfectly good hammer to the bin because some idiots say it can build a house on its own. Just like with hammers you need to make sure you don’t hit yourself in the thumb and use it for purpose
they can always ask chatgpt how to fix the problem
well she is half my age and that is a well known time invariant so she is 22
yes. yes, they did.
well this happens because people have zero understanding of what programming is. they think that programmers have memorised some “dictionaries” that translate human specifications to machine code with complete disregard for problem solving and design part of things.
where did you see that solution in the lemmy topic?
wow we have someone with a positive global score in the leader board! well I have solved everything I can for now: all except 20,21,24 part2. part2 of these problems made me go “oh for fucks sake”. So maybe I will just steep for a while with these questions and see if I can come up with something without having to look anywhere.
tbh even if I solve all the remaining 5 problems, I will likely not even pass 30!
for sure not but maybe I will make it to the screenshot :/
What do you mean final :( I am at 20 and am planning to at least do a couple more :p before the new year.
yea I also couldnt get the formatting to work right, triple quotes kept turning things into accented letters, so I gave up.
and also := also known as the walrus operator is very fun and sometimes very convenient to use