

If Raffensperger doesn’t personally handcuff each board member he is Literally Hitler
Seriously though I would appreciate OP’s thoughts on what additional actions he should take
If Raffensperger doesn’t personally handcuff each board member he is Literally Hitler
Seriously though I would appreciate OP’s thoughts on what additional actions he should take
IMO at least one of those omitted words was not unnecessary
From the article:
Conscientiousness, one of the Big Five personality traits, is defined as a tendency to control one’s impulses, be persistent, act dutifully, and live up to one’s obligations to others.
Conscientiousness has been linked to a variety of positive traits and behaviors, such as responsibility, dependability, hard work, goal orientation, self-control, and leadership. Some conscientious people, however, happen to be dogmatic, inflexible, unquestioningly obedient, and intolerant of uncertainty (i.e., they tend to see things in black-and-white).
Nah, I was born in 1987, and 2012 is definitely when it went to shit with the “tea party”
Yeah.
I fear that my original comment might be misconstrued so I just want to make it (probably annoyingly) explicit:
FWIW I fully believe Trump did this and worse, but that’s just me
The lawsuit itself appears to be real, not fake.
The allegations may not be true.
It’s subtle, but there’s a difference
We’ve probably already seen the major stuff from the house committees investigation. If this does anything, it will only make it a little more fresh
Regarding flight: where to? Of similar “democracies” Europe and Canada have similarly troubling trends. Scandinavia? Australia? SE Asia? Are they any better, really?
Just because I was curious: I counted 23 R, 22 D, 1 I. That might be off by one or two but I was surprised (well maybe not really) how evenly split it was
I’m in his district, I’ll see what I can do
“Tech” is a conflated term. The way I read OP is that they don’t want their cars main user interface to be a smartphone app. Doesn’t mean the car can’t be technologically advanced.
Personally, my brain manages to filter out anything with a leading underscore (I don’t know the origin offhand, I think some system I worked with at some point used those on files that I knew I didn’t care about). So when coworkers use leading underscores it slows me down a bit.
It does work though
Tangential, but Blind Guardian has one
Hmm my brain initially read this as “I kink shame all republicans” and…it kinda works?
Can you please elaborate?
They did fail, but then succeeded in impeachment. For no actual reason.
I get so frustrated when an article introduces a new term, says what somebody thinks about it, then goes off on some tangent before finally describing the issue at hand two thirds of the way through the article.
Signature matching is supposedly a way to prevent fraud, in which a voter’s signature on a ballot, or in this case petition, is confirmed to correspond with a signature from the same voter registered in the state’s database. But it has been criticized widely as a method of voter suppression.
Not even a concept of a plan?