Ahhh interesting. I haven’t worked with webrtc so never ran into that!

You should try out something that utilizes the normal system webview instead of electron that just bundles chromium.

Check out tauri

Do we have the same client?

Yep you can self-host findmydevice anywhere. Personally, I deployed it on fly.io as I don’t expose my local network to the internet for security reasons

https://gitlab.com/Nulide/findmydevice

Headscale

Matrix server (conduwuit, soon to be tuwunel)

Matrix bridges (slack, discord, whatsapp)

Adguard

Pihole

Findmydevice

Redlib

Linkwarden

Forgejo

Ntfy

Molly socket

Home assistant

Uptime Kuma

There’s probably more that I’m forgetting lol

Guess my org fucked it up ¯\(ツ)/¯

At least in my org we use semantic versioning ( Major.Minor.patch) where patch must either be a new feature, a fix, or something that is backwards compatible

Minor can be breaking

Major is basically something you’re proud of lol

You can get a glinet router. They have a WiFi 7 device coming out shortly as well.

I’ve got this set up in home assistant, with smart bulbs that don’t access the internet at all. Its really nice, goes from an orange red in the morning to full white back to orange red. Eventually will get all of the bulbs in my house set up with it but for now I have it only in my room

Automation: https://github.com/basnijholt/adaptive-lighting Bulbs: https://kaufha.com/blf10/

I wish I had a QA like this.

Hoping that accrescent starts seeing some more activity

Tangentally related, FUTO put a bad taste in my mouth when they were harassing the graphene is team https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/113443396794247106

You can also set up MollySockets for notifications via unified push!

How does rmk compare with qmk?

Onprem has always been cheaper. Cloud compute was the most successful marketing campaign I can think of.

We use them for our password blacklisting. Crazy fast even with millions of entries

It’ll just cache telemetry locally then send it in when you reconnect to the network

nice! ill give this a try tomorrow

I also dont like videos for this stuff. Summarized using kagi’s universal summarizer, sharing here:

• The integration of Rust into the Linux kernel has been a contentious topic, with some long-term maintainers resisting the changes required for memory-safe Rust code.
• The debate over Rust vs. C in the Linux kernel has taken on “almost religious overtones” in certain areas, reflecting the differing design philosophies and expectations.
• Linus Torvalds sees the Rust discussion as a positive thing, as it has “livened up some of the discussions” and shows how much people care about the kernel.
• Not everyone in the kernel community understands everything about the kernel, and specialization is common - some focus on drivers, others on architectures, filesystems, etc. The same is true for Rust and C.
• Linus does not think the Rust integration is a failure, as it’s still early, and even if it were, that’s how the community learns and improves.
• The challenge is that Rust’s memory-safe architecture requires changes to the existing infrastructure, which some long-time maintainers, like the DRM subsystem people, are resistant to.
• The Linux kernel has developed a lot of its own memory safety infrastructure over time for C, which has allowed incremental changes, whereas the Rust changes are more “in your face.”
• Despite the struggles with Rust integration, Linus believes Linux is so widely used and entrenched that alternative “bottom-up grown-up from the start Rust kernels” are unlikely to displace it.
• Linus sees the embedded/IoT space as an area where alternative kernels built around different languages like Rust may emerge, but does not see Linux losing its dominance as a general-purpose OS.
• Overall, Linus views the Rust debate as a positive sign of the community’s passion and an opportunity to learn, even if the integration process is challenging.

is it not relatively trivial to pre-vet content before they train it? at least with aigen text it should be.