mars296

2/12

We just add a bit of water to the dry food.

Not necessarily. They could be down voted because what they mentioned is hated for a good reason. Like if someone posts “Nazis” or “cancer”.

The House won’t pass the bill.

This is possible on kbin.

I thought it was saying that the actual tech companies were preparing to get attacked by the drones.

To be fair, they do typically need staff that are paid by themselves. They need a residence in DC and their home state too.

More likely it takes out democracy.

They didn’t actually lie under oath. They say that the ruling is precedent and settled law. They do not say that they would not overturn precedent.

And they will always argue that you do not want a justice that is not willing to overturn pass precedents. If not for overturning past precedents, segregation, etc. would still be legal.

I think its expected for a conservative to make bad-faith arguments. In principle I agree that since justices are not supposed to be partisan politicians should not be asking how the justice would rule on a future case. But it is bullshit that the nominee doesn’t have to give real answers to their thoughts on past cases.

Same at my Costco. They have 6 or maybe even 9 “self checkouts” and each is manned by an employee who scans everything without removing anything from the cart. Its basically a compact checkout. Recently was in another area and the Costco had true self checkouts with weight sensors messing up and requiring employee overide and all. It was a pain in the ass.

Thats a tortoise 🤓

Before I read the article I assumed she was proud of bomb threats against her by libs she pissed off… but no. She is proud she inspired her followers to make bomb threats. What a psycho.

Going to trial may have cost her millions in lawyers. $200k may not have been enough.

DeSantis can’t run again so it will be a new fascist either way.

Its just used that way to make it less wordy. Like when people say “Raising money for cancer” instead of “raising money for cancer research”. I always find it mildly humorous but the intent is obvious.

You are so right. Media/government/society has been conflating objectivity with neutrality. Many things are objectively right or wrong.

I haven’t looked into their reasoning at all but I would guess “the original” was incapacitated by his stroke so democrats put a clone in to take his place to keep the well liked politician in power.

The whole thing is floppy now.