

It’d be really nice if they clustered by instance. Then one could theoretically follow all politicians in their favorite party without having to look them up manually.


It’d be really nice if they clustered by instance. Then one could theoretically follow all politicians in their favorite party without having to look them up manually.
Sometimes local subscribers is nice to know. Maybe not more important than total subscribers, but useful nonetheless. Especially on a small/specific instance where you get to know your instance-mates, you might want to know how many of them are following a thing and whether you’re about to introduce them to something entirely new.


Well would you look at that


Expand and term-limit SCOTUS. This system is ridiculous


Oh but getting sucked into random bullshit is what they want


Same


Not to mention the study confirmed that the two groups has similar mortality before covid and before the vaccines


Sometimes the obvious answer is wrong, but there are plenty of other reasons to run this study. Advocacy is better with real numbers backing it up, there are probably similar circumstances that are less obvious that now warrant a closer look…


I think the commenter didn’t notice that the analysis controlled for age through stratification. You’re right that that confounding variable is taken care of.


That’s kind of the problem I think. I was able to find like 2 people there I want to follow. Lemmy is going to be far more successful at displacing its alternative because all the communities you’d want to subscribe to are here.


No. My other instance is WireBase.org. It’s a smaller one


It’s type 2 fun. You don’t want to do it, but you’re glad you did when you do


Wow two developers! How do I support the other person?


How do the coworkers of the instance host get paid?
They have to expand and term limit SCOTUS. Dilute his power, incentivize good behavior and force him out eventually