How cultured of them

Guy’s Finnish. The chances of him being actually communist are pretty much zero.

I didn’t care about deplatforming until Elon banned me on Twitter for dunking on him

Huehuehue

But Twitter has been dead ever since threads took over…

That’s eurocentric. For someone in the south hemisphere the earth actually rotates clockwise.

You show your appreciation by giving all your money to big tech.

Edit: Thanks for the gold, kind stranger!

Vanilla Firefox with default settings is actually horrible ngl

He still got hacked nonetheless 🤷

So years of Microsoft’s advertising dalle did nothing to educate the public about how ai works but they’re suddenly all experts the week after stable diffusion comes out?

Nobody complained about copyright when Microsoft had the only image ai in the game, only when the open source stable diffusion came out did they start screeching about how ai was “stealing their jobs”.

Don’t worry, ““artists”” only complain about ai when open source ai gets released.

Unicode should have enforced the principle of using the same encoding for similar looking characters like they did with CJK instead of allowing bullshit like the Cyrillic “o” or the Greek question mark.

I’m gonna have to say that Google is correct in this case. Use uBlock Origin instead.

If those people have ever tried actually using image generation software they will know that there is significant human authorship required to make something that isn’t remotely dogshit. The most important skill in visual art is not how to draw something but knowing what to draw.

>FAGMAN trains ai to ban content about criminal gang activity

>FAGMAN ai bans journalist documenting criminal gang activity without regards to context because it is a machine

I’m gonna have to say that the ai is correct here. Rather it’s the entire approach to “content safety” that’s wrong.

Penguin cum

The tech equivalent of inventing leaded gasoline.

Finally someone who actually uses critical thinking instead of being an anti-Elon bandwagoner.

I don’t think mandating lidar specifically by name is right, seeing as computer vision is definitely a software problem. Instead they should mandate some method to detect objects in any light condition + a performance standard, which in practice during certification could mean lidar. Regulations should be as minimal and specific as possible.