

Coming soon to a Supreme Court near you:
“It is this Court’s opinion that this rule infringes on businesses’ First Amendment right to free speech.”
Coming soon to a Supreme Court near you:
“It is this Court’s opinion that this rule infringes on businesses’ First Amendment right to free speech.”
The car itself should never come with something that will require recurring payments.
Cars already do. Satellite radio has been a thing for decades now. I’ve never used it. Never felt the desire to use it. I haven’t even taken the free trial. I’m less annoyed that it exists, and more annoyed that I’m forever fated to receive unsolicited junk mail for this feature that I have to unceremoniously dump in the recycling bin every couple weeks.
As for the remote start, yeah, it’s kinda bullshit that they’ve removed the more permanent, older version of a feature to replace it with something out of the owners’ control. If anything, it should exist in parallel with the key fob button, not replace it entirely. I’m less concerned about the fact that it’s a subscription than I am about the prospect of that feature dropping support down the road with no recourse for the owner.
Is there anything Trump hasn’t lied about?
Batman: The Animated Series
Unique art style (it was drawn on black paper), excellent writing, excellent voice acting.
To be clear, “final solution” is a phrase OP added for effect, not literally quoted from Trump in this instance.
Down in Palm Beach county there’s still occasionally people who hang out on overpasses over I-95 holding Trump banners on the bridge over rush hour traffic. This was happening in 2023 when we weren’t even in election season.
He doesn’t need to have watertight censorship of outside sources to have meaningful control. The USA has relatively little censorship and we still have a sizable population that are happy to accept any old bullshit as fact, without any impetus to question or validate it.
I don’t fully understand. The Supreme Court has granted immunity for official acts performed as President. Aren’t the charges for this case for actions from before his presidency, and therefore not subject to immunity?
To be fair, the description included “Florida-woman” so that alone disqualified those other two nutjobs.
Charge him with what, exactly? He has a first amendment right to fly whatever politically divisive flag he (or his wife if we’re to believe him) chooses, just as anyone else does. As far as I’m aware, the Supreme Court still has no legally-binding ethics rules, so no matter how clear a bias he shows, there’s no crime to prosecute. His recusal is at his sole discretion.
I don’t know if the legislative branch has the authority to codify a legally enforceable code of ethics that has some backbone, but even if they do I’m sure someone would fight it up to the Supreme Court where they’d just nullify it anyway.
I mean technically 16 is a round number, but it’s also a square which makes it sound less round and more pointy.
Can’t say for sure on this product, but on most of their other products they use some weird brick that plugs straight into a SATA port without an additional power connection. Maybe eMMC, maybe NAND flash, IDK.
Because there are legitimate reasons for some robo calls. Appointment reminders and confirmations, school weather closure announcements, two-factor login verification, etc.
Range and guidance are not the whole package. I severely doubt North Korea has the ability to defeat US missile defenses.
You don’t want your 1.4 million dollars back?
He has since paid his back taxes, so this isn’t a valid argument.
"In the year after he disclosed a federal investigation into his “tax affairs” in late 2020, President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, paid off a significant tax liability, even as a grand jury continued to gather evidence in a wide-ranging examination of his international business dealings, according to people familiar with the case.
Mr. Biden’s failure to pay all his taxes has been a focus of the ongoing Justice Department investigation. While wiping out his liability does not preclude criminal charges against him, the payment could make it harder for prosecutors to win a conviction or a long sentence for tax-related offenses, according to tax law experts, since juries and judges tend to be more sympathetic to defendants who have paid their bills."
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html
Whoosh. OP was using Musk’s own words against him.