Cheating is like divorce it’s common if you look at the percentage of relationships. They are both less common if you look at at individuals. Cheaters always cheat again, those who get divorced often do so again.
Cheating is like divorce it’s common if you look at the percentage of relationships. They are both less common if you look at at individuals. Cheaters always cheat again, those who get divorced often do so again.
They can help you for the rest of your life
What they settle on isn’t too important other than it won’t be the dollar.
Bulls seem like they are capable of herd defense, they are kept isolated for a reason. Same with roosters and chickens.
They can’t go over the people with a 300 page tax return that uses past paper losses to cover any actual income. They already automated enforcement of w2 based income.
That’s becoming less true year over year though. Excessive debt can make it less attractive as a standard in addition to the growth of both the Euro zone and BRICS.
In a traditional long bow yes. In a modern compound bow, not necessarily.
Pot committed is more a math reality with a small amount of sunk cost fallacy. There’s always a non zero chance someone is bluffing. A 99% chance to lose $11 is better than a 100% chance to lose $10 if you can win $100 on that 1%.
They are more similar than they are different though. The numbers are bigger and the limits aren’t known, but they do exist. Many countries have felt the pain of excessive debt, the arguments that it can’t happen to the US are essentially that the US is a unicorn country.
Try making friends first, or at least understanding them. If you aren’t willing or capable of doing that you are just going to make things worse.
There a big difference in seeking something out and someone walking up to you and talking at you.
It’s less about valuing communication and more about the dopamine hit. Delivering that lecture and educating the simpletons feels really good.
Do you want people to care or do you want to lecture people who don’t agree with you. People like to give lectures on politics, but no one listens to them. If you want people to care you have to care about them.
Even in a shooter, you can make maps that encourage different play styles or have different interactive elements that can change the map. Not all of those may exist at launch, or more informed ideas can be used.
Doing post release content can be good. It gives the devs a chance to do something after they are more familiar with the tools and what content players prefer.
If you know even a little about how an LLM works it’s obvious why regex is basically impossible for it. I suspect perl has similar problems, but no one is capable of actually validating that.
Yelp and more scrolling past ads. Mostly caring about style and food pics. Reviews are pretty trash, so depending on the type of place anything 3+ Stars is generally worth looking at.
This part was incredibly frustrating. Personal and second hand examples.
A lady believed the defendant couldn’t possibly rob a place during his lunch break. It was a 5-10 minute drive from his workplace. Couldn’t point this out on a map, because one wasn’t introduced as evidence.
A lady couldn’t believe that a corrections officer would just be a dick to an inmate. There is no way they would ever use the ability to search a cell to destroy property or as retaliation.
You can’t just destroy money. With fractional reserve banking any bank can create money, but they can’t destroy it. Only the Fed can “destroy” money by buying bonds back and not reselling them. Forgiving a is a loss to the lender, in the case of student loans, the government guarantees them, so the lender gets made whole and the government assumes the debt on behalf of the borrower.
Printers are solved now, you just don’t have one.