Not looking for approval from a zio

snuffing out internal leftist movements is an American tradition.

He’s such a hardcore Zionist that he’d probably do it for free.

Yeah and there’s something threatening it: a rabid client state

welcome to the "fed’ iverse

I’ll endorse any candidate that is against killing children.

They’re casting an embarrassment. Nobody in the middle east is happy with the USA except Israel.

Currently they’re being killed and shot for sitting in their refugee tent.

Previously, when they attempted peaceful protests they were shot. There are countless videos of this.

Paraplegic children are shot square through their foreheads, for simply laying in a bed.

There’s a lot of falsehoods you just stated, but let’s start with one of the common misconceptions: that Palestinians have never tried peaceful protests. They did, many times, most recently in the great march of return.

They were shot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018–2019_Gaza_border_protests

No, its a pretty well documented critique. The EC increased the South’s delegates by a huge margin.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/electoral-colleges-racist-origins

It protected a business-friendly candidate from one that was supported by women and minorities. The system worked perfectly.

What it was designed for, to protect the slave states and provide another barrier to populist movements.

Also the EC will never be abolished, despite whatever candidates promise every 4 years. It’s too useful.

Americans are about to find out how much their reps love genocide

Iran can do that pretty easily it seems

true it would be hilarious if he were killed on jan 6

stop encouraging people to vote for trump

Yes agreed.

I think I know where you’re confused. Here’s the original claim that begat this thread,

It’s not controversial to say that the US / NATO helped trigger the war in Ukraine.

The claim is about an opinion being generally accepted. To confirm or refute the claim requires secondary sources, since the claim is about opinions.

If the claim were simply,

US / NATO helped trigger the war in Ukraine.

Then the claim is concerned directly with what triggered the war in Ukraine. To confirm or refute the claim, you’d benefit more from primary sources (including journalism, as you mentioned.)

I have to agree that completely ignoring the nytimes op-ed section is healthy and brings you closer to the truth. I’m glad we’ve established that.

I think you’re working deep under cover for Russia.

Oh, in this case an opinion piece in US media is evidence. @catsarebadpeople believed that the opinion (NATO’s expansion partially caused the war) was limited to Russian / BRICS media.