• 0 Posts
  • 69 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 13th, 2024

help-circle




  • TRULY modern OS

    What does this even mean? So iOS, MacOS, Windows11, Linux aren’t modern?

    a way better compositor than wayland (in fact, android has the best compositor in the world, compared to ANY OS)

    Wayland is not a compositor, it’s a protocol. SurfaceFlinger can totally be made in Wayland. Saying SurfaceFlinger is better than Wayland is like saying words are better than English.

    A properly modified desktop OS based on it (better than Samsung’s DeX for example), that is also able to run normal Linux apps, would be a huge winner.

    Nobody will ever use this on Linux, unless it is implemented in Wayland. It is infinitely more likely for Android to rewrite its compositor for Wayland than SurfaceFlinger being adopted as Linux’s main compositor.











  • It can’t be irrelevant as it’s the primary factor in deciding if the fine will even be brought.

    Is DSA the only way for your company to get fined? If the answer is no, then yes, it’s irrelevant. Because while your company may not be eligible for a DSA fine, there are countless different situations which could leave you in the same spot.

    Personal liability applies to many actions under the law

    Yes, but none of those actions involve what is happening here. The DSA clearly states that the company may be fined up to 6% of its yearly revenue.

    your scaremongering of small family business becoming some governments targets are unfounded.

    What scaremongering? This is a valid concern. If Elon Musk’s rights as a company owner can be violated, who says yours can’t?


  • Actions you don’t like aren’t corrupt. Actions Elon doesn’t like aren’t corrupt.

    Can you point to where I said or implied the opposite?

    In fact arguably Elon is the corrupt individual in this case

    I never said Elon was in the right. I have stated that his company must be punished for the decisions it made, not the owner as per the protections guaranteed by the law to company owners.

    the EU is simply applying the law to the corrupt individual.

    You mean the law that violates your rights as the head of a corporation, which is supposed to protect your assets from those of the company? Cool.