I very much hope not. Luckily they seem to be doing well.
- 20 Posts
- 63 Comments
But then you wake up right away. You weren’t conscious for hours bu for you it felt instant. We really can’t image it.
If life isnt enjoyable, would disappearing really make a difference?
I think I wouldn’t mind being dead, as I couldn’t feel anything anyways. But existing and then suddenly not even knowing I don’t exist sounds very scary. When I forget what I was thinking about a few seconds ago, at least I know that I did forget about something. I think the fear stems from the fact that no one can even imagine how death feels like. Sleeping or being in a coma isn’t even close as it feels like a time skip.
I try to see the world and everything in it for what it really is. I don’t believe in fate, god, karma, souls, etc. The way I see it, I’m depressed and don’t enjoy life because I’m just a collection of electrical signals/chemical processes inside of my brian. And my brain is fucked. I can’t relate to people who genuinely enjoy life. I get sparks of happyness but spend most of the time being miserable.
Another personal reasons for why I don’t enjoy life is change. I know that no change = no progress = boredom, but I still despise it. And look at that, literally everything in life changes all the fucking time. Loved ones die, pets die, the tech I love slowly dies out.
And then there is the looming threat of dying at any moment because I’m a fragile organism that can die even while sleeping. That terrifies me to no end. Just suddenly not existing. And yes I have watched motivational videos advocating for why we shouldn’t fear death. I’m not buying it.
Firefox is literally not in Ubuntu’s repos anymore. They didn’t want to maintain it as Mozilla agreed to just make the Snap version that works across all Ubuntu versions and anywhere else.
What should the command do? Just fail? Instead it clearly tells you it’s downloading the snap of Firefox.
In fact if it was up to me I would just get rid of most GUI apps from the repos that have a snap/flatpak equivalent.
I disagree for many reasons, but I realize that nobody on Lemmy really gives a shit since people here react to anything that even smells of proprietary as if it was radioactive.
You act as if Snap was bad in any way. Proprietary backend does not equal bad.
Edit: Most people don’t care about FOSS vs proprietary. And the snap client is FOSS anyways, plus it’s capable of installing snaps from local files.
Lmao. As if corporate operating systems were bad. What makes RedHat that much better tho? I want to know. From what I’ve seen they are both bringing a lot of value to the FOSS space.
tsugu@slrpnk.netto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Reminder for Windows 10 users who can't upgrade to Windows 11
1·1 year agoFair enough. Tho if you do discover some functional hardware that’s unsupported by W11, know that you don’t have to turn to Linux at all.
tsugu@slrpnk.netto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Reminder for Windows 10 users who can't upgrade to Windows 11English
1·1 year agoDownload the Windows 11 ISO and tick an option to mitigate the new requirements in Rufus. That’s all you have to do. Or download the Windows 10 IoT iso from massgrave. Supported until 2030-something.
By doing what exactly? Snap’s server being proprietary doesn’t affect anyone at all, what else?
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I made a script that configures Ubuntu (mainly its GNOME) the way I like it. I also made it work in Debian and Fedora.
1·1 year agoI was recommended this https://flathub.org/apps/io.github.vikdevelop.SaveDesktop Seems very user friendly and can do everything except for installing software.
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Ok guys, who games on an IoT version of Ubuntu?
9·1 year agoThe money comes from corporate customers, that’s the sad truth. If you go to RedHat’s website, their Worsktation option is hidden in menus as well. Fedora doesn’t seem to be mentioned at all.
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Ok guys, who games on an IoT version of Ubuntu?
22·1 year agoI politely disagree. Finding the Core ISO is harder than the Server/Desktop ones. https://ubuntu.com/download/core
There’s a Build Your Core button. And that takes you to a docs page that lets you download a pre-built image. I think it’s pretty obvious that this is not the Desktop Ubuntu.
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Ok guys, who games on an IoT version of Ubuntu?
34·1 year agoLmao.
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I made a script that configures Ubuntu (mainly its GNOME) the way I like it. I also made it work in Debian and Fedora.
1·1 year agoYeah, that sucks. I would still want it if I were to use Fedora, as an option.
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I made a script that configures Ubuntu (mainly its GNOME) the way I like it. I also made it work in Debian and Fedora.
2·1 year agoI checked and Fedora dropped support for the snap plugin. https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/enable-snap-in-gnome-software/76134
These are also the only packages related to gnome-software:
Related Packages gnome-software-devel gnome-software-fedora-langpacks gnome-software-rpm-ostreeFrom what I remember, their gnome-software already has flatpak support. So all that will be missing is the GUI snap support. Could’ve been worse.
tsugu@slrpnk.netOPto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I made a script that configures Ubuntu (mainly its GNOME) the way I like it. I also made it work in Debian and Fedora.
2·1 year agoI added
sudo apt install gnome-software-plugin-snap gnome-software-plugin-flatpak gnome-softwareLooks like Fedora does not havegnome-software-plugin-snaporgnome-software-plugin-flatpakin its repos.




Everything else is FOSS besides the server and snaps can even be installed locally. I wrote a section of an article about most of the complaints. Most of the complaints I hear are just elitistic bullshit that makes new users confused and spreads misinformation.