These things should never come down to the individual skill of the programmer. There should be systems and checks in place to assure the quality. And if the quality isn’t reached, the programmer needs enough time and support to reach them.

But we all know, being thorough doesn’t pay.

What Russia wants us to think:

“O no, allowing Ukraine to fire atacms into Russia was to much escalation! We must back down!”

What we actually think:

“Russia ran out of missiles and has to reach deep down its soviet arsenal to fire the last thing it’s got. Next, they’ll fire an R7”

Articles about deextinction often reference the Pyrenean Ibex that died 7 minutes after birth. Why has nobody tried that one again?

Insertion Sort.

It’s easier to remember how to program than quick sort and it’s stable (it keeps the previous order for same value data)

The fact that the first lady does speeches and the presidents family is in the spotlight at all. (Rather dynastic for a democracy)

So when he droned on about Hannibal lecter, was he trying to talked about Hannibal Barca?

(I don’t want to listen to the speech)

Yeah, like a digital “ideal line” that the cars can follow.

Maybe even a physical guiding line.

We could even connect all the cars via WLAN (WiFi) to exchange info when they are braking and accelerating. That would increase efficiency.

Maybe we could even connect them physically to have a stronger engine pulling more cars more efficiently.

If we already have an ideal guiding line, we might actually save some asphalt and make the roads more optimised. Use different materials so the tyre particles don’t pollute as much.

Ah, let’s just build a train.

Or they speak English as a foreign language. Then all the swear words hold no value or weight, unlike in your native language.

Brussels effect baby

(Or is it Bruxelles? Brüssel?)