It’s visual pollution anywhere. I cannot for the life of me fathom why anyone finds that style appealing to begin with.

The guy streamed a video to his Facebook. Want hard for journalists to track down.

Most would agree, but putting a worse person in power through apathy or inaction isn’t the solution.

Eh, then you just get those idiots who avoid using TODO: because it makes the code review “harder”.

// This is a broken example.
// Note: remove X before doing Y

I bought some half-inch silicone feet to separate mine from the shelf it sits on. The added airflow underneath seems to do just fine.

I recently installed OPNsense specifically because I had to buy a mini PC with 2.5 gig ports. There simply isn’t anything reasonable on the market for the prosumer above the 1 gig threshold. Running splendidly on a Beelink EQ12.

Also, OPNsense has things OpenWRT doesn’t offer (plugins, IPS, etc.)

You know who else thinks public executions are a valid means of maintaining power and control over others? Religious extremists…oh wait.

There’s no qualification to be a developer to access github though, I think is what the person you responded to is saying. It’s entirely possible for a user to end up at github without a true understanding of its purpose. Therefore, it would be helpful if it was more clear to the average non-developer user that what they’re looking at is a code repository and is not meant for general consumption.

You forgot the switch.

The best surprises come from unexpected places.

Welcome to missing the point, population: you.

“The left is just as bad.”

Must be awesome having your head buried so deep in the sand that you can drink straight from the water table.

I will pour my heart, soul and life savings into an AOC for president campaign as soon as she decides she’s ready.

No

Most people commenting here didn’t hear the questions beyond what clips they heard via the media. The ignorance is astounding. And in a hard core anti-trump voter.

No. The questions posed by the Supreme Court centered around whether there was merit in allowing any single state, which may have arbitrary criteria and or processes, to effectively eliminate a candidate from the ballot, and if so, under what constraints. Ours a valid question. Where is the line? If you allow this precedent, how might it be abused by others?

I’m a voter. I will ‘do shit’. It’s a fucked up world and many people fit your generalization, but it’s the job of reasonable people everywhere to educate others and promote sanity and optimism wherever possible.

Needs more pop tv talk show interviews.

Sometimes I forget what I was looking for and have to restart the mental loop when doing this.