For a gay high schooler living in the U.S., it is with extreme difficulty that I watch the American and Israeli governments exploit my sexual identity to excuse ongoing ethnic cleansing.

The Progress Pride Flag was never intended to fly over the corpses of dead Palestinians. Like many queer young people today, I have watched with paralyzing anger as the symbol of our liberation waves atop armed Israeli killing machines and our existence is commodified as justification for Israel’s imperial violence. Israel has no right to wave any flag over the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Yet, for that flag to be colored with a rainbow is illustrative of the settler state’s incorrect, dangerous rationale for carrying out its ongoing genocide.

As Israel and its associated settler colonies market themselves as “gay havens,” they perpetuate the flip side narrative as well—that Palestinians are a barbaric and homophobic population of uncivilized heathens. The narrative itself is anerasure of Palestinian queer life and Israel’s oppression of LGBTQ residents. It ignores that Western colonialism has historically led to worse treatment of LGBTQ minorities in colonized regions. When the British claimed “Mandate Palestine” in 1920, they passed sweeping anti-gay legislation that still governs homosexual relationships in Gaza today. Throughout history, in the name of bringing civilization to Middle Eastern communities, colonialists have criminalized queerness and facilitated queer oppression.

Moreover, Israel itself has punished LGBTQ identities since the state’s birth. The current Netanyahu administration has positionedhomophobicleaders at the peaks of the Israeli government, refuses to legalize gay marriage, and faces rampant rates ofanti-LGBTQ sentiment in the country. Israel cannot be considered a pro-gay force for freedom as it continues the erasure of Palestinian queer life, facilitates an ongoing genocide, and furthers anti-queer lawmaking.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And where the fuck did I say that?

    I’m sorry your comment totally didn’t 100% imply that. Good that you corrected me there with plausible deniability.

    What the fuck does that have to do with the pre-European Middle East criminalizing homosexuality?

    Iran was becoming more secularized and “Western” until their government was overthrown in 1953 and AGAIN in 1979 for not giving free oil to Britain and America.

    LGBT stuff in the West was stigmatized until like 20 years ago and you’re out here criticizing governments from 70 years ago for not being progressive enough.

    1950’s was when America was just getting rid of their Jim Crow apartheids laws.

    Your argument is just presentism

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My argument… disputing that homophobia and homophobic laws in the Middle East originated from European influence… is presentism.

      Okay. You have fun with that.

      None of your arguments surrounding Iran are even vaguely relevant.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My argument… disputing that homophobia and homophobic laws in the Middle East originated from European influence… is presentism.

        You’re saying that the new laws under British colonialism are not relevant. From the article:

        When the British claimed “Mandate Palestine” in 1920, they passed sweeping anti-gay legislation that still governs homosexual relationships in Gaza today. Throughout history, in the name of bringing civilization to Middle Eastern communities, colonialists have criminalized queerness and facilitated queer oppression.

        If you look up Iran before 1950 the capital was starting to Westernize. You’re implying that the West had amazing gay rights during the 1950’s while America didn’t even have Gay Marriage until 2004.

        And after America coup’d Iran’s regime with operation Ajax, Iran becomes super progressive… And then in 1979 America overthrew Iran again (probably for still being too regressive on gay rights) and installed Ayatollah Khomeini. Another massive success for gay rights under American imperialism!

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re saying that the new laws under British colonialism are not relevant. From the article:

          Yes, because, unlike the author of the piece, who can be forgiven for being a high schooler, I recognize that the laws being referenced in this case under British colonial rule were new only in wording. The Ottomans before them, as well as regional authorities in Palestine, had plenty of laws used as cudgels against the LGBT community. The British also implemented laws against stealing; that doesn’t mean that the British fucking brought the idea of personal property to the Middle East.

          If you look up Iran before 1950 the capital was starting to Westernize. You’re implying that the West had amazing gay rights back then when America didn’t even have Gay Marriage until 2004.

          Fucking what.

          Where do I imply that the West had amazing gay rights before 2004? Where do I reference the gay rights situation of the West positively at all in my argument?

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rich, considering you’ve went on a multi-comment rant about Iran that has nothing to do with anything anyone brought up, while I’m still discussing the point that I initially commented on - the relevance of British colonial law to homophobia in the Middle East.