Sharp and sustained economic criticism from Biden's ostensible allies established a narrative of failure that has proved alarmingly resistant to reality.
The problem isn’t Biden’s handling of the economy. It’s his signaling that he sees it as a solved issue and we’re all okay again. When in reality 63 percent of the country is still struggling.
You can try to use top level stats to gas light people all day long but we have eyes. If Biden would just stop trying to take a victory lap for one second he wouldn’t be getting booed about it.
And your donkeyball tonsil hockey is only a little tedious as, apparently, your only party trick.
Seriously though, if you’re gonna jerk off to the fantasies you’re collecting in your post history, maybe do it without the rest of Lemmy forced to watch? Don’t mean to yuck your yum and all, but: thafuq is wrong with you?
“Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”
The problem isn’t Biden’s handling of the economy. It’s his signaling that he sees it as a solved issue and we’re all okay again. When in reality 63 percent of the country is still struggling.
You can try to use top level stats to gas light people all day long but we have eyes. If Biden would just stop trying to take a victory lap for one second he wouldn’t be getting booed about it.
Stats are stats. Feelings are feelings.
Lmao. Yes over half the country struggling to pay for things is just feelings.
See you say half. That’s not a stat. That’s a feeling
Don’t act like I didn’t literally just link you the data showing it’s 63 percent of the country.
And your donkeyball tonsil hockey is only a little tedious as, apparently, your only party trick.
Seriously though, if you’re gonna jerk off to the fantasies you’re collecting in your post history, maybe do it without the rest of Lemmy forced to watch? Don’t mean to yuck your yum and all, but: thafuq is wrong with you?
I bet you think you’re clever when you drink.
Removed, rule 3:
“Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”